Investigation of deep level defects in electron irradiated indium arsenide quantum dots embedded in a gallium arsenide matrix

被引:8
作者
Strong, Wyatt H. [1 ]
Forbes, David V. [1 ]
Hubbard, Seth M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rochester Inst Technol, NanoPower Res Lab, Rochester, NY 14623 USA
关键词
Irradiation; Quantum dots; DLTS; Accumulation peak; TRANSIENT SPECTROSCOPY; GAAS; GROWTH; PHOTORESPONSE; CAPTURE; TRAPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.mssp.2014.01.034
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Gallium arsenide diodes with and without indium arsenide quantum dots were electron irradiated to investigate radiation induced defects. Baseline and quantum dot gallium arsenide pn-junction diodes were characterized by capacitance-voltage measurements, and deep level transient spectroscopy. Carrier accumulation was observed in the gallium arsenide quantum dot sample at the designed depth for the quantum dots via capacitance-voltage measurements. Prior to irradiation, a defect 0.84 eV below the conduction band (E-C - 0.84 eV) was observed in the baseline sample which is consistent with the native EL2 defect seen in gallium arsenide. After 1 MeV electron irradiation three new defects were observed in the baseline sample, labeled as E3 (E-C - 0.25 eV), E4 (E-C - 0.55 eV), and E5 (E-C - 0.76 eV), consistent with literature reports of electron irradiated gallium arsenide. Prior to irradiation, the addition of quantum dots appeared to have introduced defect levels at E-C - 0.21, E-C - 0.38, and E-C - 0.75 eV denoted as QD-DX1, QD-DX2, and QD-EL2 respectively. In the quantum dot sample after 1 MeV electron irradiation, QD-E3 (E-C - 0.28 eV), QD-E4 (E-C - 0.49 eV), and QD-EL2 (E-C - 0.72 eV) defects, similar to the baseline sample, were observed, although the trap density was dissimilar to that of the baseline sample. The quantum dot sample showed a higher density of the QD-E4 defect and a lower density of QD-E3, while the QD-EL2 defect seemed to be unaffected by electron irradiation. These findings suggest that the quantum dot sample may be more radiation tolerant to the E3 defect as compared to the baseline sample. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 83
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
[31]   AN ANNEALING STUDY OF ELECTRON IRRADIATION-INDUCED DEFECTS IN GAAS [J].
PONS, D ;
MIRCEA, A ;
BOURGOIN, J .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1980, 51 (08) :4150-4157
[32]   IRRADIATION-INDUCED DEFECTS IN GAAS [J].
PONS, D ;
BOURGOIN, JC .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS C-SOLID STATE PHYSICS, 1985, 18 (20) :3839-3871
[33]  
Pons D., 1978, INT C DEF RAD EFF SE, P352
[34]   ANTISITE DEFECTS IN III-V-SEMICONDUCTORS [J].
POTZ, W ;
FERRY, DK .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1984, 29 (10) :5687-5693
[35]  
Prezioso M., INT C ADV SEM DEV MI, P237
[36]   Simulating the Radiation Response of GaAs Solar Cells Using a Defect-Based TCAD Model [J].
Turowski, Marek ;
Bald, Timothy ;
Raman, Ashok ;
Fedoseyev, Alex ;
Warner, Jeffrey H. ;
Cress, Cory D. ;
Walters, Robert J. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2013, 60 (04) :2477-2485
[37]   InAs/InGaAsN quantum dots emitting at 1.55 μm grown by molecular beam epitaxy [J].
Ustinov, VM ;
Egorov, AY ;
Odnoblyudov, VA ;
Kryzhanovskaya, NV ;
Musikhin, YG ;
Tsatsul'nikov, AF ;
Alferov, ZI .
JOURNAL OF CRYSTAL GROWTH, 2003, 251 (1-4) :388-391
[38]   IDENTIFICATION OF A DEFECT IN A SEMICONDUCTOR - EL2 IN GAAS [J].
VONBARDELEBEN, HJ ;
STIEVENARD, D ;
DERESMES, D ;
HUBER, A ;
BOURGOIN, JC .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1986, 34 (10) :7192-7202
[39]   Non-exponential capture of electrons in GaAs with embedded InAs quantum dots [J].
Walther, C ;
Bollmann, J ;
Kissel, H ;
Kirmse, H ;
Neumann, W ;
Masselink, WT .
PHYSICA B-CONDENSED MATTER, 1999, 273-4 :971-975
[40]  
Warner J., 2005, 8 EUR C RAD ITS EFF