Receiver Operating Characteristic Prediction for Classification: Performances in Cross-Validation by Example

被引:6
作者
Ciocan, Andra [1 ,2 ]
Hajjar, Nadim Al [2 ,3 ]
Graur, Florin [2 ,3 ]
Oprea, Valentin C. [2 ,4 ]
Ciocan, Razvan A. [5 ]
Bolboaca, Sorana D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iuliu Hatieganu Univ Med & Pharm Cluj Napoca, Dept Med Informat & Biostat, Louis Pasteur St 6, Cluj Napoca 400349, Romania
[2] Prof Dr Octavian Fodor Reg Inst Gastroenterol & H, Croitorilor St 19-21, Cluj Napoca 400162, Romania
[3] Iuliu Hatieganu Univ Med & Pharm Cluj Napoca, Dept Surg, Croitorilor St 19-21, Cluj Napoca 400162, Romania
[4] Dr Constantin Papilian Mil Emergency Hosp Cluj Na, Gen Traian Mosoiu St 22, Cluj Napoca 400132, Romania
[5] Iuliu Hatieganu Univ Med & Pharm, Dept Med Skills Human Sci, Marinescu St 23, Cluj Napoca 400337, Romania
关键词
receiver operating characteristic; area under the curve; models performances; biomarkers; metastasis; NEUTROPHIL-TO-LYMPHOCYTE; EVALUATING DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS; COLORECTAL-CANCER; ROC CURVE; MODEL SELECTION; GOLD STANDARD; RATIO; ACCURACY; SURVIVAL; AREA;
D O I
10.3390/math8101741
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The stability of receiver operating characteristic in context of random split used in development and validation sets, as compared to the full models for three inflammatory ratios (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR), derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (dNLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) ratio) evaluated as predictors for metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer, was investigated. Data belonging to patients admitted with the diagnosis of colorectal cancer from January 2014 until September 2019 in a single hospital were used. There were 1688 patients eligible for the study, 418 in the metastatic stage. All investigated inflammatory ratios proved to be significant classification models on both the full models and on cross-validations (AUCs > 0.05). High variability of the cut-off values was observed in the unrestricted and restricted split (full models: 4.255 for NLR, 2.745 for dNLR and 255.56 for PLR; random splits: cut-off from 3.215 to 5.905 for NLR, from 2.625 to 3.575 for dNLR and from 134.67 to 335.9 for PLR), but with no effect on the models characteristics or performances. The investigated biomarkes proved limited value as predictors for metastasis (AUCs < 0.8), with largely sensitivity and specificity (from 33.3% to 79.2% for the full model and 29.1% to 82.7% in the restricted splits). Our results showed that a simple random split of observations, weighting or not the patients with and whithout metastasis, in a ROC analysis assures the performances similar to the full model, if at least 70% of the available population is included in the study.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Cross-validation of Peak Oxygen Consumption Prediction Models From OMNI Perceived Exertion
    Mays, R. J.
    Goss, F. L.
    Nagle, E. F.
    Gallagher, M.
    Haile, L.
    Schafer, M. A.
    Kim, K. H.
    Robertson, R. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 37 (10) : 831 - 837
  • [22] Receiver operating characteristic estimation and threshold selection criteria in three-class classification problems for clustered data
    To, Duc-Khanh
    Adimari, Gianfranco
    Chiogna, Monica
    Risso, Davide
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (07) : 1325 - 1341
  • [23] Comparison of classification methods with "n-class" receiver operating characteristic curves: A case study of energy drinks
    Racz, Anita
    Bajusz, David
    Fodor, Marietta
    Heberger, Karoly
    CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2016, 151 : 34 - 43
  • [24] Improvement of Risk Prediction by Genomic Profiling: Reclassification Measures Versus the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve
    Mihaescu, Raluca
    van Zitteren, Moniek
    van Hoek, Mandy
    Sijbrands, Eric J. G.
    Uitterlinden, Andre G.
    Witteman, Jacqueline C. M.
    Hofman, Albert
    Hunink, M. G. Myriam
    van Duijn, Cornelia M.
    Janssens, A. Cecile J. W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 172 (03) : 353 - 361
  • [25] Cross-validation of prediction equations for estimating the body mass index in adults without the use of body weight
    Nunes Filho, Julio Cesar Chaves
    Nunes, Marilia Porto Oliveira
    de Matos, Robson Salviano
    Pinto, Daniel Vieira
    Pereira, Dyego Castelo Branco Holanda Gadelha
    Branco, Thais Amanda Silva Pereira Castelo
    Da Silva Junior, Geraldo Bezerra
    Ramalho, Janaina de Almeida Mota
    Daher, Elizabeth De Francesco
    PLOS ONE, 2025, 20 (02):
  • [26] Internal-external cross-validation helped to evaluate the generalizability of prediction models in large clustered datasets
    Takada, Toshihiko
    Nijman, Steven
    Denaxas, Spiros
    Snell, Kym I. E.
    Uijl, Alicia
    Nguyen, Tri-Long
    Asselbergs, Folkert W.
    Debray, Thomas P. A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 137 : 83 - 91
  • [27] Receiver operating characteristic analysis of prediction for gastric cancer development using serum pepsinogen and Helicobacter pylori antibody tests
    Hamashima, Chisato
    Sasazuki, Shizuka
    Inoue, Manami
    Tsugane, Shoichiro
    BMC CANCER, 2017, 17
  • [28] Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve-Based Prediction Model for Periodontal Disease Updated With the Calibrated Community Periodontal Index
    Su, Chiu-Wen
    Yen, Amy Ming-Fang
    Lai, Hongmin
    Chen, Hsiu-Hsi
    Chen, Sam Li-Sheng
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2017, 88 (12) : 1348 - 1355
  • [29] Joint use of over- and under-sampling techniques and cross-validation for the development and assessment of prediction models
    Blagus, Rok
    Lusa, Lara
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 16
  • [30] Utility of the 2019 EULAR/ACR SLE classification criteria for predicting mortality and hospitalisation: development and cross-validation of ominosity score
    Figueroa-Parra, Gabriel
    Hanson, Andrew C.
    Sanchez-Rodriguez, Alain
    Meade-Aguilar, Jose A.
    Gonzalez-Trevino, Mariana
    Cuellar-Gutierrez, Maria C.
    Barbour, Kamil E.
    Duarte-Garcia, Ali
    Crowson, Cynthia
    RMD OPEN, 2024, 10 (04):