Variable Turbulent Prandtl Number Model for Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction

被引:29
作者
Roy, Subhajit [1 ]
Pathak, Utkarsh [1 ]
Sinha, Krishnendu [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Aerosp Engn, Bombay 400076, Maharashtra, India
关键词
SHOCK-UNSTEADINESS MODEL; NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS; LINE RELAXATION; HEAT-FLUX; FLOWS; REYNOLDS; WAVE;
D O I
10.2514/1.J056183
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Interaction of shock waves with turbulent boundary layers can enhance the surface heat flux dramatically. Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations based on a constant turbulent Prandtl number often give grossly erroneous heat transfer predictions in shock/boundary-layer interaction flows. This is due to the fact that the underlying Morkovin's hypothesis breaks down in the presence of shock waves; thus, the turbulent Prandtl number cannot be assumed to be a constant. In this paper, a new variable turbulent Prandtl number model based on linearized Rankine-Hugoniot conditions applied to shock-turbulence interaction is developed. The turbulent Prandtl number is a function of the shock strength, and a shock function is proposed to identify the location and strength of shock waves. The shock function also simulates the postshock relaxation of the turbulent heat flux, which is akin to that observed in canonical shock-turbulence interaction. The model is combined with the well-validated shock-unsteadiness k- model and is applied to the complex shock topology observed in oblique shock/turbulent boundary-layer interactions. Comparison with experimental data shows significant improvement in the surface heat transfer rate in the interaction region, both for attached and separated shock/boundary-layer interaction cases. The shock function is also used to propose a robust form of the existing shock-unsteadiness k- model that simplifies the numerical implementation enormously.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 355
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Bradshaw P., 29 AER SCI M JAN
[2]   Hypersonic Shock Wave Impingement on Turbulent Boundary Layers: Computational Analysis and Uncertainty [J].
Brown, James L. .
JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2013, 50 (01) :96-123
[3]  
Coakley T., 30 AER SCI M EXH JAN
[4]   Turbulence modeling advances and validation for high speed aeropropulsive flows [J].
Dash, Sanford M. ;
Brinckman, Kevin W. ;
Ott, James D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AEROACOUSTICS, 2012, 11 (7-8) :813-850
[5]  
Emami B., 2010, J FLUIDS ENG, V132, DOI [10. 1115/1. 4001341 JFEGA4 0098-2202, DOI 10.1115/1.4001341JFEGA40098-2202]
[6]  
Forsythe J., 29 AIAA FLUID DYN C
[7]   Progress in shock wave/boundary layer interactions [J].
Gaitonde, Datta V. .
PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2015, 72 :80-99
[8]   TURBULENT PRANDTL NUMBER - WHERE ARE WE [J].
KAYS, WM .
JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1994, 116 (02) :284-295
[9]  
Knight D. D., 2001, 23 INT S SHOCK WAV U, P2761
[10]   Reynolds- and Mach-number effects in canonical shock-turbulence interaction [J].
Larsson, Johan ;
Bermejo-Moreno, Ivan ;
Lele, Sanjiva K. .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2013, 717 :293-321