Modeling and Simulation Analysis of Journal Impact Factor Dynamics Based on Submission and Citation Rules

被引:4
作者
Zhou, Jian [1 ]
Feng, Lin [1 ]
Cai, Ning [2 ,3 ]
Yang, Jie [4 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Sch Artificial Intelligence, Beijing 100876, Peoples R China
[3] Northwest Minzu Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Chinas Ethn Languages & Informat Technol, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Res Inst Informat Technol, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
AGENT-BASED MODEL; SYSTEMS; SCIENCE; DOCUMENTATION; PUBLICATION; ASSOCIATION; PERFORMANCE; LIMITATIONS; DIMENSION; INDEXES;
D O I
10.1155/2020/3154619
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The variation of the journal impact factor is affected by many statistical and sociological factors such as the size of citation window and subject difference. In this work, we develop an impact factor dynamics model based on the parallel system, which can be used to analyze the correlation between the impact factor and certain elements. The parallel model aims to simulate the submission and citation behaviors of the papers in journals belonging to a similar subject, in a distributed manner. We perform Monte Carlo simulations to show how the model parameters influence the impact factor dynamics. Through extensive simulations, we reveal the important role that certain statistics elements and behaviors play to affect impact factors. The experimental results and analysis on actual data demonstrate that the value of the JIF is comprehensively influenced by the average review time, average number of references, and aging distribution of citation.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, Generative social science: Studies in agent-based computational modeling
  • [2] Emergence of scaling in random networks
    Barabási, AL
    Albert, R
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) : 509 - 512
  • [3] Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country
    Bordons, M
    Fernández, MT
    Gómez, I
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2002, 53 (02) : 195 - 206
  • [4] Can the journal impact factor be used as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers? A large-scale empirical study based on ResearcherID data
    Bornmann, Lutz
    Williams, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2017, 11 (03) : 788 - 799
  • [5] Bornmann L, 2016, EMBO REP, V17, P1094, DOI 10.15252/embr.201642823
  • [6] Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics
    Bornmann, Lutz
    Marx, Werner
    Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
    Kitas, George D.
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 32 (07) : 1861 - 1867
  • [7] Scholarly impact assessment: a survey of citation weighting solutions
    Cai, Liwei
    Tian, Jiahao
    Liu, Jiaying
    Bai, Xiaomei
    Lee, Ivan
    Kong, Xiangjie
    Xia, Feng
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2019, 118 (02) : 453 - 478
  • [8] A Novel Clustering Method Based on Quasi-Consensus Motions of Dynamical Multiagent Systems
    Cai, Ning
    Diao, Chen
    Khan, M. Junaid
    [J]. COMPLEXITY, 2017,
  • [9] Cioffi-Revilla C, 2014, Introduction to Computational Social Science: Principles and Applications
  • [10] The economy needs agent-based modelling
    Farmer, J. Doyne
    Foley, Duncan
    [J]. NATURE, 2009, 460 (7256) : 685 - 686