A Civil Aircraft Cockpit Layout Evaluation Method Based on Layout Design Principles

被引:5
作者
Cao, Kang [1 ]
Zhang, Yongjie [1 ]
Jiang, Yuefan [1 ]
Zeng, Yongqi [1 ]
Cui, Bo [1 ]
Dong, Wenjun [2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Civil Aviat, Xian 710072, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Aircraft Design & Res Inst, Shanghai 201210, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
civil aircraft; cockpit design; layout optimization; evaluation models; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.3390/aerospace9050251
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
As technology continues to leap forward and innovations advance, the systems of civil aircraft are becoming increasingly sophisticated and complex. Accordingly, there is a rising amount of information to be processed by pilots in the cockpit, increasing their cognitive burden, which significantly threatens the safety of flight. Thus, designers have formulated cockpit layout principles relating to importance, frequency of use, functional grouping, and operation sequence on the basis of ergonomics, which can effectively reduce the cognitive burden for pilots. The degree to which the cockpit layout of a model conforms to the four design principles can indicate its ergonomic design level. In accordance with the concepts of the above four cockpit layout principles, evaluation methods for determining their respective conformity to the four design principles were proposed in this paper. These methods use the operational sequence of cockpit system controls used in the normal flight mission of the actual aircraft type as the evaluation data source. Subsequently, the total evaluation results for cockpit layout were obtained using the weighted accumulation method. Lastly, the process for evaluating the cockpit layouts of civil aircraft was illustrated using the cockpits of the A320 series and B737NG series as examples. Based on the final evaluation results, the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed evaluation method was verified.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, CHINESE J NATURE
[2]  
BEASLEY JE, 1985, J OPER RES SOC, V36, P297
[3]  
Boeing, 2012, STAT SUMM COMM JET A
[4]   Human factors approach for evaluation and redesign of human-system interfaces of a nuclear power plant simulator [J].
Carvalho, Paulo V. R. ;
dos Santos, Isaac L. ;
Gomes, Jose Orlando ;
Borges, Marcos R. S. ;
Guerlain, Stephanie .
DISPLAYS, 2008, 29 (03) :273-284
[5]   An algorithm of global optimization for solving layout problems [J].
Feng, EM ;
Wang, XL ;
Wang, XM ;
Teng, HF .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 114 (02) :430-436
[6]   ALG - A MODEL FOR GENERATING ALTERNATIVE LAYOUT GRAPHS UNDER ARCHITECTURAL CONSTRAINTS [J].
HASHIMSHONY, R ;
ROTH, J .
COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 1986, 18 (08) :431-436
[7]   A heuristic quasi-physical strategy for solving disks packing problem [J].
Huang, WQ ;
Yan, K .
SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2002, 10 (3-4) :195-207
[8]   A new relaxed flexible bay structure representation and particle swarm optimization for the unequal area facility layout problem [J].
Kulturel-Konak, Sadan ;
Konak, Abdullah .
ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2011, 43 (12) :1263-1287
[9]  
Lavagna M., 2003, P INT ASTRONAUTICAL
[10]   ON THE THRESHOLDS OF KNOWLEDGE [J].
LENAT, DB ;
FEIGENBAUM, EA .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1991, 47 (1-3) :185-250