A demonstration of the application of the new paradigm for the evaluation of forensic evidence under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic-voice-comparison case

被引:28
作者
Enzinger, Ewald [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart [1 ,4 ]
Ochoa, Felipe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Elect Engn & Telecommun, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Natl ICT Australia NICTA, Australian Technol Pk, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Austrian Acad Sci, Acoust Res Inst, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[4] Univ Alberta, Dept Linguist, Edmonton, AB, Canada
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Forensic voice comparison; Likelihood ratio; Validity; Reliability; Mismatch compensation; SPEAKER VERIFICATION; LIKELIHOOD-RATIO; CHANNEL COMPENSATION; TELEPHONE; IDENTIFICATION; VARIABILITY; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; SCIENCE; COURT;
D O I
10.1016/j.scijus.2015.06.005
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
The new paradigm for the evaluation of the strength of forensic evidence includes: The use of the likelihood-ratio framework. The use of relevant data, quantitative measurements, and statistical models. Empirical testing of validity and reliability under conditions reflecting those of the case under investigation. Transparency as to decisions made and procedures employed. The present paper illustrates the use of the new paradigm to evaluate strength of evidence under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic-voice-comparison case. The offender recording was from a landline telephone system, had background office noise, and was saved in a compressed format. The suspect recording included substantial reverberation and ventilation system noise, and was saved in a different compressed format. The present paper includes descriptions of the selection of the relevant hypotheses, sampling of data from the relevant population, simulation of suspect and offender recording conditions, and acoustic measurement and statistical modelling procedures. The present paper also explores the use of different techniques to compensate for the mismatch in recording conditions. It also examines how system performance would have differed had the suspect recording been of better quality. (C) 2015 The Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 57
页数:16
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Expressing evaluative opinions: A position statement [J].
Aitken, Colin ;
Berger, Charles E. H. ;
Buckleton, John S. ;
Champod, Christophe ;
Curran, James ;
Dawid, A. P. ;
Evett, Ian W. ;
Gill, Peter ;
Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Joaquin ;
Jackson, Graham ;
Kloosterman, Ate ;
Lovelock, Tina ;
Lucy, David ;
Margot, Pierre ;
McKenna, Louise ;
Meuwly, Didier ;
Neumann, Cedric ;
Daeid, Niamh Nic ;
Nordgaard, Anders ;
Puch-Solis, Roberto ;
Rasmusson, Birgitta ;
Redmayne, Mike ;
Roberts, Paul ;
Robertson, Bernard ;
Roux, Claude ;
Sjerps, Marjan J. ;
Taroni, Franco ;
Tjin-A-Tsoi, Tjark ;
Vignaux, G. A. ;
Willis, Sheila M. ;
Zadora, Grzegorz .
SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2011, 51 (01) :1-2
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, P 14 AUSTR INT C SPE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Forensic database of voice recordings of 500+ Australian English speakers, 2015
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CRIM LAW REV
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, TECHNICAL REPORT
[7]   Evidence evaluation: A response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T [J].
Berger, Charles E. H. ;
Buckleton, John ;
Champod, Christophe ;
Evett, Ian W. ;
Jackson, Graham .
SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2011, 51 (02) :43-49
[8]   How to assign a likelihood ratio in a footwear mark case: an analysis and discussion in the light of R v T [J].
Biedermann, A. ;
Taroni, F. ;
Champod, C. .
LAW PROBABILITY & RISK, 2012, 11 (04) :259-277
[9]  
Brookes M., 1998, VOICEBOX SPEECH PROC
[10]   Analysis of feature extraction and channel compensation in a GMM speaker recognition system [J].
Burget, Lukas ;
Matejka, Pavel ;
Schwarz, Petr ;
Glembek, Ondfei ;
Cernocky, Jan 'Honza' .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO SPEECH AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING, 2007, 15 (07) :1979-1986