Accuracy of 8 intraocular lens calculation formulas in relation to anterior chamber depth in patients with normal axial lengths

被引:50
作者
Gokce, Sabite Emine [1 ,4 ]
De Oca, Ildamaris Montes [1 ]
Cooke, David L. [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Li [1 ]
Koch, Douglas D. [1 ]
Al-Mohtaseb, Zaina [1 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Cullen Eye Inst, 6565 Fannin NC 205, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Great Lakes Eye Care, St Joseph, MO USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Coll Osteopath Med, Dept Neurol & Ophthalmol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[4] Dunya Goz Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.01.015
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the effect of anterior chamber depth (ACD) on the accuracy of 8 intraocular lens calculation formulas in patients with normal axial lengths (ALs). Setting: Baylor College of Medicine, Alkek Eye center, Houston, Texas, USA. Design: Retrospective case series. Methods: Patients having cataract surgery with ALs between 22.0 mm and 25.0 mm were divided into 3 groups based on their preoperative ACD measurement. The mean prediction errors, mean absolute errors (MAEs), and median absolute errors for each group were calculated. Results: For the ACD of 3.0 mm or less group and the ACD of 3.5 mm or more group, the Barrett Universal II, Holladay 2, Haigis, and Olsen ray-tracing formulas had mean prediction error values that were not significantly different from zero. For the ACD of 3.01 to 3.49 mm group, all formulas had mean prediction error values that were not significantly different from zero. For the ACD of 3.0 mm or less group, the Barrett Universal II formula had a smaller median absolute error than the Haigis, Hoffer Q, and Olsen optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) (Lenstar) formulas and a smaller MAE than the Hoffer Q, Hill-RBF, and Olsen OLCR (P < .05). In the ACD of 3.5 mm or more group, the Barrett MAE was smaller than the Hoffer Q (P < .05); however, there were no significant differences between median absolute errors. Conclusion: in eyes with normal ALs, taking preoperative ACD values into consideration might improve refractive outcomes. (C) 2018 ASCRS and ESCRS
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 368
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Comparison of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas [J].
Cooke, David L. ;
Cooke, Timothy L. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (08) :1157-1164
[2]   Distribution of Axial Length and Ocular Biometry Measured Using Partial Coherence Laser Interferometry (IOL Master) in an Older White Population [J].
Fotedar, Reena ;
Wang, Jie Jin ;
Burlutsky, George ;
Morgan, Ian G. ;
Rose, Kathryn ;
Wong, Tien Y. ;
Mitchell, Paul .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 117 (03) :417-423
[3]   Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis [J].
Haigis, W ;
Lege, B ;
Miller, N ;
Schneider, B .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 238 (09) :765-773
[4]  
Hoffer KJ, 2007, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V33, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.054
[5]   Clinical results using the Holladay 2 intraocular lens power formula [J].
Hoffer, KJ .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 26 (08) :1233-1237
[6]   Achieving emmetropia in extremely short eyes with two piggyback posterior chamber intraocular lenses [J].
Holladay, JT ;
Gills, JP ;
Leidlein, J ;
Cherchio, M .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 103 (07) :1118-1123
[7]   A 3-PART SYSTEM FOR REFINING INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER CALCULATIONS [J].
HOLLADAY, JT ;
PRAGER, TC ;
CHANDLER, TY ;
MUSGROVE, KH ;
LEWIS, JW ;
RUIZ, RS .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1988, 14 (01) :17-24
[8]  
Holladay JT., 1999, Houston TX, Holladay LASIK Institute
[9]   Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: Comparison of 7 formulas [J].
Kane, Jack X. ;
van Heerden, Anton ;
Atik, Alp ;
Petsoglou, Constantinos .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (10) :1490-1500
[10]   Pursuing perfection in intraocular lens calculations: I. Logical approach for classifying IOL calculation formulas [J].
Koch, Douglas D. ;
Hill, Warren ;
Abulafia, Adi ;
Wang, Li .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 43 (06) :717-718