Constraining cloud droplet number concentration in GCMs suppresses the aerosol indirect effect

被引:97
作者
Hoose, C. [1 ]
Kristjansson, J. E. [1 ]
Iversen, T. [3 ]
Kirkevag, A. [3 ]
Seland, O. [3 ]
Gettelman, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Geosci, N-0315 Oslo, Norway
[2] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[3] Norwegian Meteorol Inst, N-0313 Oslo, Norway
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
COMMUNITY ATMOSPHERE MODEL; CLIMATE MODEL; MICROPHYSICS SCHEME; SULFATE; CAM3;
D O I
10.1029/2009GL038568
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Global aerosol-climate models with prognostic treatment of cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC) often prescribe lower bounds for CDNC or aerosol concentrations. Here we demonstrate that this possibly unphysical constraint reduces the simulated aerosol indirect effect by up to 80%, caused by extensively uniform CDNCs. In present-day conditions, the impact of the prescribed lower bound for CDNC is mainly visible over oceans, while with preindustrial emissions, large parts of both land and ocean areas are influenced. We furthermore show that imposing the same constraints on aerosol instead of on CDNC reduces the aerosol indirect effect to a lesser extent. Citation: Hoose, C., J. E. Kristjansson, T. Iversen, A. Kirkevag, O. Seland, and A. Gettelman (2009), Constraining cloud droplet number concentration in GCMs suppresses the aerosol indirect effect, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L12807, doi: 10.1029/2009GL038568.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   A parameterization of aerosol activation 2. Multiple aerosol types [J].
Abdul-Razzak, H ;
Ghan, SJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2000, 105 (D5) :6837-6844
[2]   Aerosols before pollution [J].
Andreae, Meinrat O. .
SCIENCE, 2007, 315 (5808) :50-51
[3]   Global assessment of marine boundary layer cloud droplet number concentration from satellite [J].
Bennartz, R. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2007, 112 (D2)
[4]   Computational assessment of a proposed technique for global warming mitigation via albedo-enhancement of marine stratocumulus clouds [J].
Bower, Keith ;
Choularton, Tom ;
Latham, John ;
Sahraei, Jalil ;
Salter, Stephen .
ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2006, 82 (1-2) :328-336
[5]  
CHOULARTON TW, 1993, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V119, P443, DOI 10.1002/qj.49711951105
[6]   The formulation and atmospheric simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model version 3 (CAM3) [J].
Collins, William D. ;
Rasch, Philip J. ;
Boville, Byron A. ;
Hack, James J. ;
McCaa, James R. ;
Williamson, David L. ;
Briegleb, Bruce P. ;
Bitz, Cecilia M. ;
Lin, Shian-Jiann ;
Zhang, Minghua .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2006, 19 (11) :2144-2161
[7]   A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the community atmosphere model, version 3 (CAM3). Part II: Single-column and global results [J].
Gettelman, A. ;
Morrison, H. ;
Ghan, S. J. .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2008, 21 (15) :3660-3679
[8]   A physically based estimate of radiative forcing by anthropogenic sulfate aerosol [J].
Ghan, SJ ;
Easter, RC ;
Chapman, EG ;
Abdul-Razzak, H ;
Zhang, Y ;
Leung, LR ;
Laulainen, NS ;
Saylor, RD ;
Zaveri, RA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2001, 106 (D6) :5279-5293
[9]   Aircraft observations of cloud droplet number concentration: Implications for climate studies [J].
Gultepe, I ;
Isaac, GA .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 130 (602) :2377-2390
[10]  
Hegerl GC, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P663