Increased body mass index is associated with operative difficulty during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:5
作者
Shapiro, Daniel D. [1 ]
Davis, John W. [1 ]
Williams, Wendell H. [2 ]
Chapin, Brian F. [1 ]
Ward, John F. [1 ]
Pettaway, Curtis A. [1 ]
Gregg, Justin R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Houston, TX USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Houston, TX USA
来源
BJUI COMPASS | 2022年 / 3卷 / 01期
关键词
prostate cancer; prostatectomy; robotic surgery; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; SURGICAL DIFFICULTY; OUTCOMES; CANCER; RESECTION; OBESE;
D O I
10.1002/bco2.110
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to identify factors associated with surgeon perception of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) difficulty.Patients and Methods: This study surveyed surgeons performing RARP between 2017 and 2018 and asked them to rate operative conditions and difficulty as optimal, good, acceptable, or poor. These answers were stratified as optimal or suboptimal for this study. Associations between surgeon responses and variables hypothesized to affect surgical difficulty, including anatomic factors such as pelvic diameter and prostate volume:pelvic diameter ratio, were assessed.Results: Between November 2017 and September 2018, a total of 100 patients were prospectively enrolled in the study of which 58 cases were rated as optimal and 42 were rated as suboptimal. Of the evaluated variables, only increasing clinical T stage (odds ratio [OR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-2.15, p = 0.03) and increasing body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.26, p = 0.01) were associated with increased difficulty; 90-day complication rates were similar between the optimal and suboptimal cohorts (17.3% vs. 23.8%, respectively; p = 0.5). The number of patients with previous surgery, pelvic diameter, and prostate size:pelvic diameter ratio were not significantly different between cohorts (p > 0.05 for all). Operative time (rho = 0.23, p = 0.02) and estimated blood loss (EBL) (rho = 0.38, p = 0.0001) were correlated with suboptimal difficulty.Conclusion: The factors associated with surgeon-reported RARP difficulty were patient BMI and clinical T stage among surgeons with significant RARP experience. These data should be incorporated into surgical decision making and patient counseling prior to performing a RARP.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 74
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
    Dindo, D
    Demartines, N
    Clavien, PA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) : 205 - 213
  • [2] Associations between intraoperative factors and surgeons' self-assessed operative satisfaction
    Erestam, Sofia
    Bock, David
    Andersson, Annette Erichsen
    Bjartell, Anders
    Carlsson, Stefan
    Kollberg, Karin Stinesen
    Sjoberg, Daniel
    Steineck, Gunnar
    Stranne, Johan
    Thorsteinsdottir, Thordis
    Tyritzis, Stavros
    Lantz, Anna Wallerstedt
    Wiklund, Peter
    Angenete, Eva
    Haglind, Eva
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (01): : 61 - 68
  • [3] MRI-based score to predict surgical difficulty in patients with rectal cancer
    Escal, L.
    Nougaret, S.
    Guiu, B.
    Bertrand, M. M.
    de Forges, H.
    Tetreau, R.
    Thezenas, S.
    Rouanet, P.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 (01) : 140 - 146
  • [4] The Benefits and Harms of Different Extents of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Fossati, Nicola
    Willemse, Peter-Paul M.
    Van den Broeck, Thomas
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Yuan, Cathy Yuhong
    Briers, Erik
    Bellmunt, Joaquim
    Bolla, Michel
    Cornford, Philip
    De Santis, Maria
    MacPepple, Ekelechi
    Henry, Ann M.
    Mason, Malcolm D.
    Matveev, Vsevolod B.
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    van der Kwast, Theo H.
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Wiegel, Thomas
    Lam, Thomas B.
    Mottet, Nicolas
    Joniau, Steven
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (01) : 84 - 109
  • [5] Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Locally-advanced Prostate Cancer
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    De Lorenzis, Elisa
    Novara, Giacomo
    Fossati, Nicola
    De Groote, Ruben
    Dovey, Zach
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 71 (02) : 249 - 256
  • [6] Overcoming the challenges of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Goldstraw, M. A.
    Challacombe, B. J.
    Patil, K.
    Amoroso, P.
    Dasgupta, P.
    Kirby, R. S.
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2012, 15 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [7] Outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with previous transurethral resection of prostate
    Gupta, Narmada P.
    Singh, Prabhjot
    Nayyar, Rishi
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (09) : 1501 - 1505
  • [8] Han H., 2020, Can Urol Assoc J
  • [9] Effect of bony pelvic dimensions measured by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on performing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Lee, Seung Tae
    Kim, Sung Soo
    Min, Kyung Eun
    Hwang, In Sik
    Kim, Myung
    Jeong, Seong Jin
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Hwang, Sung Il
    Lee, Sang Eun
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (05) : 664 - 668
  • [10] Simple preoperative parameters to assess technical difficulty during a radical perineal prostatectomy
    Horuz, Rahim
    Goktas, Cemal
    Cetinel, Cihangir A.
    Akca, Oktay
    Canguven, Onder
    Sahin, Cahit
    Kafkasli, Alper
    Albayrak, Selami
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2013, 45 (01) : 129 - 133