Comparative study of phrenic nerve transfers with and without nerve graft for elbow flexion after global brachial plexus injury

被引:29
|
作者
Liu, Yuzhou [1 ]
Lao, Jie [1 ]
Gao, Kaiming [1 ]
Gu, Yudong [1 ]
Zhao, Xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Huashan Hosp, Dept Hand Surg, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2014年 / 45卷 / 01期
关键词
Phrenic nerve; Nerve transfer; Nerve graft; Elbow flexion; SPINAL ACCESSORY NERVE; MUSCULOCUTANEOUS NERVE; AVULSION INJURIES; NEUROTIZATION; RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2012.12.013
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Nerve transfer is a valuable surgical technique in peripheral nerve reconstruction, especially in brachial plexus injuries. Phrenic nerve transfer for elbow flexion was proved to be one of the optimal procedures in the treatment of brachial plexus injuries in the study of Gu et al. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare phrenic nerve transfers with and without nerve graft for elbow flexion after brachial plexus injury. Methods: A retrospective review of 33 patients treated with phrenic nerve transfer for elbow flexion in posttraumatic global root avulsion brachial plexus injury was carried out. All the 33 patients were confirmed to have global root avulsion brachial plexus injury by preoperative and intraoperative electromyography (EMG), physical examination and especially by intraoperative exploration. There were two types of phrenic nerve transfers: type1 - the phrenic nerve to anterolateral bundle of anterior division of upper trunk (14 patients); type 2 - the phrenic nerve via nerve graft to anterolateral bundle of musculocutaneous nerve (19 patients). Motor function and EMG evaluation were performed at least 3 years after surgery. Results: The efficiency of motor function in type 1 was 86%, while it was 84% in type 2. The two groups were not statistically different in terms of Medical Research Council (MRC) grade (p = 1.000) and EMG results (p = 1.000). There were seven patients with more than 4 month's delay of surgery, among whom only three patients regained biceps power to M3 strength or above (43%). A total of 26 patients had reconstruction done within 4 months, among whom 25 patients recovered to M3 strength or above (96%). There was a statistically significant difference of motor function between the delay of surgery within 4 months and more than 4 months (p = 0.008). Conclusion: Phrenic nerve transfers with and without nerve graft for elbow flexion after brachial plexus injury had no significant difference for biceps reinnervation according to MRC grading and EMG. A delay of the surgery after the 4 months might imply a bad prognosis for the recovery of the function. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 231
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of shorter nerve graft and selective motor branch of recipient nerve on nerve transfer surgery for elbow flexion in patients with brachial plexus injury
    Pengked, Kanapot
    Laohaprasitiporn, Panai
    Monteerarat, Yuwarat
    Limthongthang, Roongsak
    Vathana, Torpon
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 139 (05) : 1405 - 1411
  • [22] Functional Outcome following Phrenic Nerve Transfer in Brachial Plexus Injury
    Vyas, Amit Kumar
    Gupta, Aviral
    Dhanjani, Bharat
    Batajoo, Santosh
    Misra, Sayantani
    JOURNAL OF HAND AND MICROSURGERY, 2023,
  • [23] Double Fascicular Nerve Transfer to Musculocutaneous Branches for Restoration of Elbow Flexion in Brachial Plexus Injury
    Texakalidis, Pavlos
    Tora, Muhibullah S.
    Lamanna, Jason
    Wetzel, Jeremy S.
    Boulis, Nicholas M.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (04)
  • [24] A quantitative assessment of the functional recovery of flexion of the elbow after nerve transfer in patients with a brachial plexus injury
    Quick, T. J.
    Singh, A. K.
    Fox, M.
    Sinisi, M.
    MacQuillan, A.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2016, 98B (11) : 1517 - 1520
  • [25] Double nerve transfer for elbow flexion in obstetric brachial plexus injury: A case report
    Estrella, Emmanuel P.
    Mella, Pierre M.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2013, 66 (03) : 423 - 426
  • [26] Results of spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfers in children with brachial plexus birth injury
    Hyttinen, Maria
    Ronkko, Henrikki
    Paavilainen, Pasi
    Helminen, Mika
    Jokihaara, Jarkko
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2024, : 362 - 369
  • [27] Nerve Transfers for Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury: Advantages and Problems
    Hems, Tim
    JOURNAL OF HAND AND MICROSURGERY, 2011, 3 (01) : 6 - 10
  • [28] A Comparison of Intercostal and Partial Ulnar Nerve Transfers in Restoring Elbow Flexion Following Upper Brachial Plexus Injury (C5-C6±C7)
    Coulet, Bertrand
    Boretto, Jorge G.
    Lazerges, Cyril
    Chammas, Michel
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 35A (08): : 1297 - 1303
  • [29] Restoration of shoulder abduction in brachial plexus injury with phrenic nerve transfer
    Sungpet, A
    Suphachatwong, C
    Kawinwonggowith, V
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 70 (11): : 783 - 785
  • [30] Nerve transfer to biceps to restore elbow flexion and supination in children with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy
    Murison, J.
    Jehanno, P.
    Fitoussi, F.
    JOURNAL OF CHILDRENS ORTHOPAEDICS, 2017, 11 (06) : 455 - 459