Comparative study of phrenic nerve transfers with and without nerve graft for elbow flexion after global brachial plexus injury

被引:29
|
作者
Liu, Yuzhou [1 ]
Lao, Jie [1 ]
Gao, Kaiming [1 ]
Gu, Yudong [1 ]
Zhao, Xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Huashan Hosp, Dept Hand Surg, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2014年 / 45卷 / 01期
关键词
Phrenic nerve; Nerve transfer; Nerve graft; Elbow flexion; SPINAL ACCESSORY NERVE; MUSCULOCUTANEOUS NERVE; AVULSION INJURIES; NEUROTIZATION; RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2012.12.013
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Nerve transfer is a valuable surgical technique in peripheral nerve reconstruction, especially in brachial plexus injuries. Phrenic nerve transfer for elbow flexion was proved to be one of the optimal procedures in the treatment of brachial plexus injuries in the study of Gu et al. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare phrenic nerve transfers with and without nerve graft for elbow flexion after brachial plexus injury. Methods: A retrospective review of 33 patients treated with phrenic nerve transfer for elbow flexion in posttraumatic global root avulsion brachial plexus injury was carried out. All the 33 patients were confirmed to have global root avulsion brachial plexus injury by preoperative and intraoperative electromyography (EMG), physical examination and especially by intraoperative exploration. There were two types of phrenic nerve transfers: type1 - the phrenic nerve to anterolateral bundle of anterior division of upper trunk (14 patients); type 2 - the phrenic nerve via nerve graft to anterolateral bundle of musculocutaneous nerve (19 patients). Motor function and EMG evaluation were performed at least 3 years after surgery. Results: The efficiency of motor function in type 1 was 86%, while it was 84% in type 2. The two groups were not statistically different in terms of Medical Research Council (MRC) grade (p = 1.000) and EMG results (p = 1.000). There were seven patients with more than 4 month's delay of surgery, among whom only three patients regained biceps power to M3 strength or above (43%). A total of 26 patients had reconstruction done within 4 months, among whom 25 patients recovered to M3 strength or above (96%). There was a statistically significant difference of motor function between the delay of surgery within 4 months and more than 4 months (p = 0.008). Conclusion: Phrenic nerve transfers with and without nerve graft for elbow flexion after brachial plexus injury had no significant difference for biceps reinnervation according to MRC grading and EMG. A delay of the surgery after the 4 months might imply a bad prognosis for the recovery of the function. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 231
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative study of phrenic and intercostal nerve transfers for elbow flexion after global brachial plexus injury
    Liu, Yuzhou
    Lao, Jie
    Zhao, Xin
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2015, 46 (04): : 671 - 675
  • [2] Comparative study of phrenic and partial ulnar nerve transfers for elbow flexion after upper brachial plexus avulsion: A retrospective clinical analysis
    Liu, Yuzhou
    Zhuang, Yongqing
    Yu, Hu
    Xiong, Hongtao
    Lao, Jie
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2018, 71 (09) : 1245 - 1251
  • [3] Optimal Axon Counts for Brachial Plexus Nerve Transfers to Restore Elbow Flexion
    Schreiber, Joseph J.
    Byun, David J.
    Khan, Mahmoud M.
    Rosenblatt, Lauren
    Lee, Steve K.
    Wolfe, Scott W.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 135 (01) : 135E - 141E
  • [4] Comparative Study of Intercostal Nerve and Contralateral C7 Nerve Transfers for Elbow Extension After Global Brachial Plexus Avulsion
    Xiao, Feng
    Lao, Jie
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 85 (03) : 272 - 275
  • [5] Rehabilitation, Using Guided Cerebral plasticity, of a Brachial plexus Injury treated with Intercostal and phrenic Nerve transfers
    Dahlin, Lars B.
    Andersson, Gert
    Backman, Clas
    Svensson, Hampus
    Bjorkman, Anders
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [6] Risk prediction model for unsuccessful elbow flexion recovery after nerve transfer surgery in patients with brachial plexus injury
    Neti, Nutdanai
    Laohaprasitiporn, Panai
    Monteerarat, Yuwarat
    Limthongthang, Roongsak
    Vathana, Torpon
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 139 (01) : 212 - 221
  • [7] Phrenic nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve for the repair of brachial plexus injury: electrophysiological characteristics
    Liu, Ying
    Xu, Xun-Cheng
    Zou, Yi
    Li, Su-Rong
    Zhang, Bin
    Wang, Yue
    NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2015, 10 (02) : 328 - 333
  • [8] The natural history of recovery of elbow flexion after obstetric brachial plexus injury managed without nerve repair
    Hems, T. E. J.
    Savaridas, T.
    Sherlock, D. A.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2017, 42 (07) : 706 - 709
  • [9] Optimal Donor Nerve to Restore Elbow Flexion After Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kim, Robert B. B.
    Bounajem, Michael
    Hamrick, Forrest
    Mahan, Mark A. A.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 90 (01) : 39 - 50
  • [10] PHRENIC NERVE TRANSFER IN THE RESTORATION OF ELBOW FLEXION IN BRACHIAL PLEXUS AVULSION INJURIES: HOW EFFECTIVE AND SAFE IS IT?
    Siqueira, Mario G.
    Martins, Roberto S.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2009, 65 (04) : A125 - A131