Do investors in Green Bond market pay a premium? Global evidence

被引:147
作者
Nanayakkara, Madurika [1 ]
Colombage, Sisira [1 ]
机构
[1] Federat Univ Australia, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Capital markets; Green Bonds; Conventional bonds; option-adjusted spread; hybrid method in panel data regression; sustainable development; CORPORATE; LIQUIDITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2019.1591611
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We examine the pricing difference of Green Bonds (GB) and conventional bonds (CBs) in capital markets worldwide. Credit spread is used to observe whether investors would like to pay a premium for GBs over CBs. This study uses panel data regression with hybrid model to analyse daily observations over the period 2016 to 2017. We employ Option-Adjusted spread (OAS) to measure the credit spreads of bonds while controlling for bond specific, macroeconomic and global factors that influence the spread. With the hybrid model used in the panel data analysis, we were able to capture the fixed-effects of variables in a random effect model. We find that GBs are traded at a premium of 63 basis points (BPS), compared with a comparable corporate bond issue. We find that the green label provides issuers an incentive to raise funds through issuing GBs while providing investors an opportunity to diversify their investments returns. Our findings provide several implications to the major stakeholders driving the GB market to scale up the market to finance the required level of global green investment needs. We stress an urgent need to support the growth of the GB market to achieve sustainable development through mitigating climate change challenges.Abbreviation GB: Green Bond; CB: Conventional Bond; YS: Yield Spread; BPS: Basis Points; OAS: Option-Adjusted Spread; PCSE: Panels Corrected Standard Errors; CPI: Consumer Price Index; GBPs: Green Bond Principles; CBS: Climate Bond Standard
引用
收藏
页码:4425 / 4437
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]  
Lepone A, 2009, AUSTRALAS ACCOUNT BU, V3
[22]   Corporate yield spreads:: Default risk or liquidity? : New evidence from the credit default swap market [J].
Longstaff, FA ;
Mithal, S ;
Neis, E .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2005, 60 (05) :2213-2253
[23]   A SIMPLE APPROACH TO VALUING RISKY FIXED AND FLOATING RATE DEBT [J].
LONGSTAFF, FA ;
SCHWARTZ, ES .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1995, 50 (03) :789-819
[24]   PRICING OF CORPORATE DEBT - RISK STRUCTURE OF INTEREST RATES [J].
MERTON, RC .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1974, 29 (02) :449-470
[25]  
S&P Dow Jones Indices, 2018, S P GLOBAL 1200
[26]   Within and between estimates in random-effects models: Advantages and drawbacks of correlated random effects and hybrid models [J].
Schunck, Reinhard .
STATA JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (01) :65-76
[27]  
Taylor D., 2018, US BOND YIELDS INTER
[28]  
Torres-Reyna O., 2007, PANEL DATA ANAL FIXE
[29]  
Williams R., 2015, Serial Correlation. A very brief overview
[30]  
Wooldridge JM, 2010, ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF CROSS SECTION AND PANEL DATA, 2ND EDITION, P1