Do investors in Green Bond market pay a premium? Global evidence

被引:147
作者
Nanayakkara, Madurika [1 ]
Colombage, Sisira [1 ]
机构
[1] Federat Univ Australia, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Capital markets; Green Bonds; Conventional bonds; option-adjusted spread; hybrid method in panel data regression; sustainable development; CORPORATE; LIQUIDITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2019.1591611
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We examine the pricing difference of Green Bonds (GB) and conventional bonds (CBs) in capital markets worldwide. Credit spread is used to observe whether investors would like to pay a premium for GBs over CBs. This study uses panel data regression with hybrid model to analyse daily observations over the period 2016 to 2017. We employ Option-Adjusted spread (OAS) to measure the credit spreads of bonds while controlling for bond specific, macroeconomic and global factors that influence the spread. With the hybrid model used in the panel data analysis, we were able to capture the fixed-effects of variables in a random effect model. We find that GBs are traded at a premium of 63 basis points (BPS), compared with a comparable corporate bond issue. We find that the green label provides issuers an incentive to raise funds through issuing GBs while providing investors an opportunity to diversify their investments returns. Our findings provide several implications to the major stakeholders driving the GB market to scale up the market to finance the required level of global green investment needs. We stress an urgent need to support the growth of the GB market to achieve sustainable development through mitigating climate change challenges.Abbreviation GB: Green Bond; CB: Conventional Bond; YS: Yield Spread; BPS: Basis Points; OAS: Option-Adjusted Spread; PCSE: Panels Corrected Standard Errors; CPI: Consumer Price Index; GBPs: Green Bond Principles; CBS: Climate Bond Standard
引用
收藏
页码:4425 / 4437
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Alexander K., 2016, support of the G20 Green Finance Study Group
[2]  
Allison P.D., 2009, Fixed Effects Regression Models. Volume, V160, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412993869.D4
[3]   LIQUIDITY, MATURITY, AND THE YIELDS ON UNITED-STATES TREASURY SECURITIES [J].
AMIHUD, Y ;
MENDELSON, H .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1991, 46 (04) :1411-1425
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, INV
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, The Cost of Being Green
[6]  
Bavana A., 2018, WHAT IS INFLATION IS
[7]  
Beers B., 2018, CURRENCY RISK AFFECT
[8]   VALUING CORPORATE SECURITIES - SOME EFFECTS OF BOND INDENTURE PROVISIONS [J].
BLACK, F ;
COX, JC .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1976, 31 (02) :351-367
[9]   PRICING OF OPTIONS AND CORPORATE LIABILITIES [J].
BLACK, F ;
SCHOLES, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (03) :637-654
[10]   Equity volatility and corporate bond yields [J].
Campbell, JY ;
Taksler, GB .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2003, 58 (06) :2321-2349