Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy

被引:13
|
作者
Kim, Yoo Min [1 ]
Hyung, Woo Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
Robotic gastrectomy; Gastric cancer; Operative outcomes; Oncologic outcomes; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; DISTAL SUBTOTAL GASTRECTOMY; ASSISTED GASTRECTOMY; RADICAL GASTRECTOMY; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; LEARNING-CURVE; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; LYMPHADENECTOMY; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s13304-020-00958-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Robotic systems were developed to overcome limitations of laparoscopic surgery with its mechanical advantages. Along with the technical advances, robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer is increasing. However, the evidence regarding safety and efficacy for robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer is not mature yet. Although studies are limited, it is evident that robotic gastrectomy has a longer operation and less blood loss compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy. Studies revealed long-term oncological outcomes after robotic gastrectomy was comparable to those after laparoscopic gastrectomy. Taken together, robotic gastrectomy with systemic lymph node dissection is suggested as a safe procedure with equivalent short- and long-term oncologic outcomes to either laparoscopic or open gastrectomy for the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. However, high cost is the most significant barrier to justify robotic surgery as a routine and standard treatment for patients with gastric cancer. In the meanwhile, robotic surgery will be expansively used as long as technologic developments continue.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 863
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy
    Yoo Min Kim
    Woo Jin Hyung
    Updates in Surgery, 2021, 73 : 853 - 863
  • [2] Hybrid Robotic and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopic Gastrectomy
    Kim, So Jung
    Jeon, Chul Hyo
    Jung, Yoon Ju
    Seo, Ho Seok
    Lee, Han Hong
    Song, Kyo Young
    JOURNAL OF GASTRIC CANCER, 2021, 21 (03) : 308 - 318
  • [3] Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Kazutaka Obama
    Yoshiharu Sakai
    Surgery Today, 2016, 46 : 528 - 534
  • [4] Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Obama, Kazutaka
    Sakai, Yoshiharu
    SURGERY TODAY, 2016, 46 (05) : 528 - 534
  • [5] Initial Experience of Robotic Gastrectomy and Comparison with Open and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
    Kuo-Hung Huang
    Yuan-Tzu Lan
    Wen-Liang Fang
    Jen-Hao Chen
    Su-Shun Lo
    Mao-Chih Hsieh
    Anna Fen-Yau Li
    Shih-Hwa Chiou
    Chew-Wun Wu
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2012, 16 : 1303 - 1310
  • [6] Initial Experience of Robotic Gastrectomy and Comparison with Open and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
    Huang, Kuo-Hung
    Lan, Yuan-Tzu
    Fang, Wen-Liang
    Chen, Jen-Hao
    Lo, Su-Shun
    Hsieh, Mao-Chih
    Li, Anna Fen-Yau
    Chiou, Shih-Hwa
    Wu, Chew-Wun
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2012, 16 (07) : 1303 - 1310
  • [7] Advantages of robotic gastrectomy for overweight patients with gastric cancer: a comparison study of robotic gastrectomy and conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy
    Masaru Komatsu
    Takahiro Kinoshita
    Eigo Akimoto
    Mitsumasa Yoshida
    Hiromi Nagata
    Takumi Habu
    Takafumi Okayama
    Masahiro Yura
    Surgery Today, 2023, 53 : 1260 - 1268
  • [8] Advantages of robotic gastrectomy for overweight patients with gastric cancer: a comparison study of robotic gastrectomy and conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy
    Komatsu, Masaru
    Kinoshita, Takahiro
    Akimoto, Eigo
    Yoshida, Mitsumasa
    Nagata, Hiromi
    Habu, Takumi
    Okayama, Takafumi
    Yura, Masahiro
    SURGERY TODAY, 2023, 53 (11) : 1260 - 1268
  • [9] Comparison of robotic gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Takeshi Omori
    Kazuyoshi Yamamoto
    Hisashi Hara
    Naoki Shinno
    Masaaki Yamamoto
    Kohei Fujita
    Takashi Kanemura
    Tomohira Takeoka
    Hirofumi Akita
    Hiroshi Wada
    Masayoshi Yasui
    Chu Matsuda
    Junichi Nishimura
    Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
    Hiroshi Miyata
    Masayuki Ohue
    Masato Sakon
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 (8) : 6223 - 6234
  • [10] Comparison of robotic gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Omori, Takeshi
    Yamamoto, Kazuyoshi
    Hara, Hisashi
    Shinno, Naoki
    Yamamoto, Masaaki
    Fujita, Kohei
    Kanemura, Takashi
    Takeoka, Tomohira
    Akita, Hirofumi
    Wada, Hiroshi
    Yasui, Masayoshi
    Matsuda, Chu
    Nishimura, Junichi
    Fujiwara, Yoshiyuki
    Miyata, Hiroshi
    Ohue, Masayuki
    Sakon, Masato
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (08): : 6223 - 6234