Using module analysis for multiple choice responses: A new method applied to Force Concept Inventory data

被引:45
作者
Brewe, Eric [1 ]
Bruun, Jesper [2 ]
Bearden, Ian G. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Florida Int Univ Dept, Dept Phys, STEM Transformat Inst, Teaching & Learning Dept, 11200 SW 8 St, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Sci, Dept Sci Educ, Oster Voldgade 3, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Sci, Niels Bohr Inst, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Sci Educ, Fac Sci, Blegdamsvej 17,Bygning Q, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020131
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
We describe Module Analysis for Multiple Choice Responses (MAMCR), a new methodology for carrying out network analysis on responses to multiple choice assessments. This method is used to identify modules of non-normative responses which can then be interpreted as an alternative to factor analysis. MAMCR allows us to identify conceptual modules that are present in student responses that are more specific than the broad categorization of questions that is possible with factor analysis and to incorporate non-normative responses. Thus, this method may prove to have greater utility in helping to modify instruction. In MAMCR the responses to a multiple choice assessment are first treated as a bipartite, student X response, network which is then projected into a response X response network. We then use data reduction and community detection techniques to identify modules of non-normative responses. To illustrate the utility of the method we have analyzed one cohort of postinstruction Force Concept Inventory (FCI) responses. From this analysis, we find nine modules which we then interpret. The first three modules include the following: Impetus Force, More Force Yields More Results, and Force as Competition or Undistinguished Velocity and Acceleration. This method has a variety of potential uses particularly to help classroom instructors in using multiple choice assessments as diagnostic instruments beyond the Force Concept Inventory.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   New instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey [J].
Adams, W. K. ;
Perkins, K. K. ;
Podolefsky, N. S. ;
Dubson, M. ;
Finkelstein, N. D. ;
Wieman, C. E. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS-PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2006, 2 (01)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, THESIS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Mathematica journal, DOI DOI 10.3402/QHW.V6I2.5918
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Networks: An Introduction, DOI 10.1162/artl_r_00062
[5]  
Bastian M., 2009, P INT AAAI C WEB SOC, V3, DOI [DOI 10.1609/ICWSM.V3I1.13937, 10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937]
[6]   Mapping university students' epistemic framing of computational physics using network analysis [J].
Bodin, Madelen .
PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS-PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2012, 8 (01)
[7]   Combining Item Response Theory and Diagnostic Classification Models: A Psychometric Model for Scaling Ability and Diagnosing Misconceptions [J].
Bradshaw, Laine ;
Templin, Jonathan .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2014, 79 (03) :403-425
[8]   Investigating student communities with network analysis of interactions in a physics learning center [J].
Brewe, Eric ;
Kramer, Laird ;
Sawtelle, Vashti .
PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS-PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2012, 8 (01)
[9]   Time Development in the Early History of Social Networks: Link Stabilization, Group Dynamics, and Segregation [J].
Bruun, Jesper ;
Bearden, Ian G. .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (11)
[10]   Talking and learning physics: Predicting future grades from network measures and Force Concept Inventory pretest scores [J].
Bruun, Jesper ;
Brewe, Eric .
PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS-PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2013, 9 (02)