Investigating the Theoretical Constructs of a Green Lean Six Sigma Approach towards Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Directions

被引:42
作者
Farrukh, Amna [1 ]
Mathrani, Sanjay [1 ]
Taskin, Nazim [2 ]
机构
[1] Massey Univ, Sch Food & Adv Technol, Auckland 0632, New Zealand
[2] Bogazici Univ, Dept Management Informat Syst, TR-34342 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
green; lean; six sigma; green lean six sigma; constructs; environmental sustainability; systematic literature review; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRY; 4.0; BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; WATER FOOTPRINT; PERFORMANCE; INTEGRATION; BARRIERS; IMPACT; FRAMEWORK; CARBON;
D O I
10.3390/su12198247
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Green lean six sigma (GLSS) is an emerging approach towards environmental sustainability in conjunction with operational achievements. The success of this approach is premised on an understanding of the different components of a GLSS program; being the determinants for its outcomes. The aim of this paper is to investigate the various constructs of GLSS that play an essential role in achieving environmental sustainability. For this purpose, a systematic review of available literature has been conducted to evaluate the drivers, enablers (tools), and outcomes of a GLSS strategy as well as its critical success factors and barriers. Findings reveal that these constructs of GLSS as a holistic approach can facilitate an organization to better accomplish environmental objectives such as waste minimization, emission reduction, and resource conservation as compared to constructs of only one or any two of these strategies. Based on the analysis, an integrated GLSS framework is developed for environmental sustainability in addition to identifying vital research gaps and future directions.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]   The complementarity of green supply chain management practices and the impact on environmental performance [J].
Al-Sheyadi, Anwar ;
Muyldermans, Luc ;
Kauppi, Katri .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 242 :186-198
[2]   Knowledge-based Lean Six Sigma maintenance system for sustainable buildings [J].
Aldairi, Jasim ;
Khan, M. K. ;
Munive-Hernandez, J. Eduardo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2017, 8 (01) :109-130
[3]   A comparative exploration of lean manufacturing and six sigma in terms of their critical success factors [J].
Alhuraish, Ibrahim ;
Robledo, Christian ;
Kobi, Abdessamad .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 164 :325-337
[4]  
Andersson R., 2006, THE TQM MAGAZINE, V18, P282, DOI DOI 10.1108/09544780610660004
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, P 24 ANN C INT GROUP
[6]  
Assarlind M, 2013, INT J QUAL RELIAB MA, V30, P387, DOI 10.1108/02656711311308385
[7]   Comprehensive water footprint assessment of the dairy industry chain based on ISO 14046: A case study in China [J].
Bai, Xue ;
Ren, Xiaojing ;
Khanna, Nina Zheng ;
Zhou, Nan ;
Hu, Mengting .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 132 :369-375
[8]   A framework to improve construction processes: Integrating Lean, Green and Six Sigma [J].
Banawi, Abdulaziz ;
Bilec, Melissa M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2014, 14 (01) :45-55
[9]  
Belamkar N, 2016, RES J PHARM BIOL CHE, V7, P1949
[10]   The integrated effect of Big Data Analytics, Lean Six Sigma and Green Manufacturing on the environmental performance of manufacturing companies: The case of North Africa [J].
Belhadi, Amine ;
Kamble, Sachin S. ;
Zkik, Karim ;
Cherrafi, Anass ;
Touriki, Fatima Ezahra .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 252