Implementation of Sensor-Controlled Decision Irrigation Scheduling in Pot-in-Pot Nursery Production

被引:0
|
作者
Lea-Cox, J. D. [1 ]
Belayneh, B. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Plant Sci & Landscape Architecture, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
web-based; sensor networks; monitoring; control; micro-pulse; MANAGEMENT; WATER;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Irrigation scheduling in ornamental operations is complex, given the large number (100-500) of species grown by individual growers and rationalization of many environmental variables, required to make precision irrigation decisions on a daily basis. We have developed a smart wireless sensor node (nR5) that is capable of integrating outputs from a range of soil moisture and environmental sensors, to schedule irrigation events based on plant daily water use. During 2012, we implemented a sensor-controlled vs. grower-controlled irrigation study at a pot-in-pot nursery in McMinnville, TN. Sensor networks were installed in two separate production blocks of 3-year-old Cornus florida (dogwood) and 2-year-old Acer rubrum (red maple) trees grown in 58-L and 116-L containers, respectively. One row of trees in each block were irrigated using sensor-based micropulse irrigation; the adjacent row and the rest of the block was independently irrigated by the grower using standard 6-minute irrigation events, typically scheduled between 2 and 4 times per day. All sensor data were logged by the nodes on a 15-min basis, and sensor-controlled irrigations were based on the running average from five individual trees per block. Tree diameters (n=10) were measured for each treatment four times during the year, to provide comparative growth data for each species. During 2012, average daily irrigation water applied by the grower to the dogwood block totaled 3.57 L/tree, compared to 1.33 L/tree applied using sensor-controlled irrigation. This near 3-fold increase in irrigation-efficiency did not reduce growth or quality of this species. We anticipate a return on investment of between three months and one year for sensor networks, depending on location, production costs and the cost of water. With reliable sensors and easy-to-use software, we are providing real-time information to growers who are scheduling irrigation applications more precisely, greatly reducing water use, reducing production costs and increasing profitability.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 100
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Growth of Hibiscus acetosella 'Panama Red' in Response to Sensor-Controlled Irrigation in Two Outdoor Nursery Settings
    Bayer, Amanda
    Ruter, John M.
    Chappell, Matthew
    van Iersel, Marc
    HORTSCIENCE, 2011, 46 (09) : S218 - S218
  • [22] MOISTURE SENSOR-CONTROLLED IRRIGATION FOR MAINTAINING BERMUDAGRASS TURF
    AUGUSTIN, BJ
    SNYDER, GH
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1984, 76 (05) : 848 - 850
  • [23] Mixtures of paper mill sludge, wood chips, bark, and peat in substrates for pot-in-pot shade tree production
    Chong, C
    Lumis, GP
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2000, 80 (03) : 669 - 675
  • [24] Using Retractable Roof Greenhouses and Pot-in-pot System for the Development of a Double-crop Tree Liner Production
    Rivera, Dania
    Mathers, Hannah Mary
    HORTSCIENCE, 2010, 45 (08) : S273 - S273
  • [25] Pot-in-pot Reduces Salinity, Chloride Uptake, and Maintains Aesthetic Value in Euonymus japonicus Thunb. Under Saline Irrigation
    Miralles, Julian
    Valdes, Raquel
    Martinez-Sanchez, Juan J.
    Banon, Sebastian
    HORTSCIENCE, 2012, 47 (05) : 607 - 613
  • [26] Morphology and irrigation efficiency of Gaura lindheimeri grown with capacitance sensor-controlled irrigation
    Burnett, Stephanie E.
    van Iersel, Marc W.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2008, 43 (05) : 1555 - 1560
  • [27] Evaluation of Whole Tree Substrate Amended with Spent Mushroom Compost or Peat Moss in the Pot-in-Pot Production of Rosa hybrida
    Summerville, Adam R.
    Maurer, Michael A.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2012, 47 (09) : S52 - S52
  • [28] MOISTURE SENSOR-CONTROLLED IRRIGATION FOR REDUCING N LEACHING IN BERMUDAGRASS TURF
    SNYDER, GH
    AUGUSTIN, BJ
    DAVIDSON, JM
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1984, 76 (06) : 964 - 969
  • [29] Use of Fiber Containers Does Not Affect Water Use or Plant Growth Compared to Plastic Containers for Pot-in-Pot Production of Birch
    Nambuthiri, Susmitha
    Geneve, Robert L.
    Fernandez, R. Thomas
    Bi, Guihong
    Niu, Genhua
    Fulcher, Amy
    Pershey, Nicholas A.
    Wang, Xueni
    HORTSCIENCE, 2012, 47 (09) : S389 - S390
  • [30] Effects of pot-in-pot production system on water consumption, stem diameter variations and photochemical efficiency of spindle tree irrigated with saline water
    Miralles, J.
    Franco, J.A.
    Sánchez-Blanco, M.J.
    Bañón, S.
    Agricultural Water Management, 2016, 170 : 167 - 175