A Research Review of Project Risk Assessment Methods

被引:1
作者
Chen Zhicheng [1 ]
Yao Lu [1 ]
Yang Jianjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Naval Univ Engn, Dept Engn Management, Wuhan, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS OF MANUFACTURING AND DESIGN SCIENCE IV, PTS 1-5 | 2014年 / 496-500卷
关键词
project risk; assessment method; review;
D O I
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.496-500.2857
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Based on the domestic and overseas researches of project risk assessment methods, this paper classifies project risk assessment methods into subjective judgment methods, evidence and deduction methods, system simulation methods and other methods. After exploring their definitions, advantages and disadvantages, this paper points out that subjective judgment and empirical analogy become two mainstream risk assessment methods. In the end, this paper claims that a risk assessment method does not need any unfathomable theory for its obvious engineering characteristics, but focuses on operability and applicability.
引用
收藏
页码:2857 / 2862
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [11] Jia Zhengyuan, 2008, ICCSS2008, P508
  • [12] Jian C, 2008, J SYSTEMS ENG ELECT, V30, P1918
  • [13] Risk identification step of the project risk management
    Kasap, Deniz
    Kaymak, Murat
    [J]. PICMET '07: PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1-6, PROCEEDINGS: MANAGEMENT OF CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2007, : 2116 - 2120
  • [14] Li Jinlin, 2006, T BEIJING I TECHNOLO, V26
  • [15] Li Kan, 2008, J SHANGHAI JIAOTONG, V42, P1851
  • [16] Lv Jianwei, 2005, RISK ANAL RISK MANAG
  • [17] [方德英 Pang Deying], 2004, [中国软科学, China Soft Science], P141
  • [18] Ping S, 2005, J LANZHOU JIAOTONG U, V24, P53
  • [19] QIAN H, 2005, J LANZHOU JIAOTONG U, V24, P53
  • [20] Sun AL, 2007, I C WIREL COMM NETW, P5293