Ecological determinants of distribution decline and risk of extinction in moths

被引:70
作者
Mattila, Niina
Kaitala, Veijo
Komonen, Atte
Kotiaho, Janne S.
Paivinen, Jussi
机构
[1] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Biol & Environm Sci, FI-40014 Jyvaskyla, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Biol & Environm Sci, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Joensuu, Fac Forest Sci, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
[4] Univ Jyvaskyla, Nat Hist Museum, FI-40014 Jyvaskyla, Finland
[5] Nat Heritage Serv Metsahallitus, FI-40101 Jyvaskyla, Finland
关键词
extinction proneness; Lepidoptera; life-history characters; Noctuidae; predictive conservation science; range size;
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00404.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
For successful conservation of species it is important to identify traits that predispose species to the risk of extinction. By identifying such traits conservation efforts can be directed toward species that are most at risk of becoming threatened. We used data derived from the literature to determine ecological traits that affect distribution, distribution change, and the risk of extinction in Finnish noctuid moths (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). The ecological traits we examined included body size, larval specificity, length of the flight period, and overwintering stage. In addition, in monophagous species we examined the effects of resource distribution. Larval specificity, length of the flight period, and the overwintering stage each had an independent effect on the risk of extinction when the effects of other traits were controlled by entering all traits into the same regression model. Not a single trait predicted the risk of extinction when analysis was conducted without controlling for the other traits. This discrepancy among the results suggests that a single trait may not be enough to allow prediction of the risk of extinction. Instead, it seems that for successful, predictive conservation science data on several ecological characteristics are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:1161 / 1168
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1999, CHEMOSPHERE GLOBAL C, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1465-9972(99)00039-2
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1998, RETKEILYKASVIO
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1995, ECOGRAPHY
  • [4] Variation in extinction risk among birds: Chance or evolutionary predisposition?
    Bennett, PM
    Owens, IPF
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1997, 264 (1380) : 401 - 408
  • [5] Human population density and extinction risk in the world's carnivores
    Cardillo, M
    Purvis, A
    Sechrest, W
    Gittleman, JL
    Bielby, J
    Mace, GM
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2004, 2 (07) : 909 - 914
  • [6] Biological determinants of extinction risk: why are smaller species less vulnerable?
    Cardillo, M
    [J]. ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2003, 6 : 63 - 69
  • [7] Dennis R.H.L., 1986, Antenna, V10, P108
  • [8] Bias in butterfly distribution maps: the effects of sampling effort
    Dennis, Roger L. H.
    Sparks, Tim H.
    Hardy, Peter B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION, 1999, 3 (01) : 33 - 42
  • [9] *FINN MET I, 2005, SUOM KESK MUUT
  • [10] Phylogenetic tests of ecological and evolutionary hypotheses: checking for phylogenetic independence
    Freckleton, RP
    [J]. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2000, 14 (01) : 129 - 134