Comparing the efficacy and safety of insulin detemir versus neutral protamine hagedorn insulin in treatment of diabetes during pregnancy: a randomized, controlled study

被引:14
作者
Ji, Jing [1 ]
He, Zhangya [2 ]
Yang, Zhao [3 ]
Mi, Yang [1 ]
Guo, Na [1 ]
Zhao, Hong [1 ]
Gao, Jiayi [2 ]
Ma, Zhengfeei [4 ]
Luo, Xiaoqin [2 ]
Han, Zhen [3 ]
机构
[1] Northwest Womens & Childrens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Nutr & Food Safety, Xian, Peoples R China
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Xian, Peoples R China
[4] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, Dept Hlth & Environm Sci, Suzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
adolescent diabetes; pregestational diabetes; gestational diabetes mellitus; insulin analogues; NPH HUMAN INSULIN; ANALOGS; HYPERGLYCEMIA; WOMEN; MALFORMATIONS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001155
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of insulin detemir (IDet) versus neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin used in pregnant women with diabetes. Research design and methods A randomized study was conducted in diabetic pregnant women (n=240) (including 132 with pregestational diabetes and 108 with gestational diabetes). All patients were randomly divided into two groups: IDet group (n=120) treated with IDet plus short acting insulin Novolin-R before three meals (RRR-IDet plan), and NPH group treated with NPH plus Novolin-R before three meals (RRR-NPH plan). Patients were enrolled during 12-28 gestation weeks and followed up until delivery. Results Basal characteristics, such as age, enrollment gestational weeks, average HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were similar between two groups. After 1 week of treatment, the FPG of IDet group were significantly lower than NPH group (p<0.05) and the time required to reach the targeted blood glucose level was significantly shorter (p<0.001). After 3 months of treatment, the HbA1c level in the two groups was normalized but there was no significant difference in HbA1c level. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two therapeutic approaches; however, the incidence of hypoglycemia in IDet group was remarkably lower than that of NPH group (p<0.05). The adverse drug reactions were rare and similar between the two groups. Conclusions For the treatment of gestational diabetes, both RRR-IDet plan and RRR-NPH plan were reported to control blood glucose effectively. Compared with NPH, IDet could control blood glucose and reached the targets faster and more effectively, thus reducing the number of insulin injections and the incidence of hypoglycemia in pregnant women without increasing adverse birth outcomes. Therefore, for pregnant women with gestational diabetes, who require insulin therapy, IDet would be an ideal basal insulin being worthy of promotion in clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2021, IDF Diabetes Atlas, VTenth
  • [2] Insulin during pregnancy, labour and delivery
    de Valk, Harold W.
    Visser, Gerard H. A.
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 25 (01) : 65 - 76
  • [3] Global estimates of the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy
    Guariguata, L.
    Linnenkamp, U.
    Beagley, J.
    Whiting, D. R.
    Cho, N. H.
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 103 (02) : 176 - 185
  • [4] Randomized controlled trial of insulin detemir versus NPH for the treatment of pregnant women with diabetes
    Herrera, Kimberly M.
    Rosenn, Barak M.
    Foroutan, Janelle
    Bimson, Brianne E.
    Al Ibraheemi, Zainab
    Moshier, Erin L.
    Brustman, Lois E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (03)
  • [5] Child Health, Developmental Plasticity, and Epigenetic Programming
    Hochberg, Z.
    Feil, R.
    Constancia, M.
    Fraga, M.
    Junien, C.
    Carel, J. -C.
    Boileau, P.
    Le Bouc, Y.
    Deal, C. L.
    Lillycrop, K.
    Scharfmann, R.
    Sheppard, A.
    Skinner, M.
    Szyf, M.
    Waterland, R. A.
    Waxman, D. J.
    Whitelaw, E.
    Ong, K.
    Albertsson-Wikland, K.
    [J]. ENDOCRINE REVIEWS, 2011, 32 (02) : 159 - 224
  • [6] Hod M, 2015, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V131, pS173, DOI [10.1016/S0020-7292(15)30007-2, 10.1016/S0020-7292(15)30033-3]
  • [7] A randomized trial comparing perinatal outcomes using insulin detemir or neutral protamine Hagedorn in type 1 diabetes
    Hod, Moshe
    Mathiesen, Elisabeth R.
    Jovanovic, Lois
    McCance, David R.
    Ivanisevic, Marina
    Duran-Garcia, Santiago
    Brondsted, Lise
    Nazeri, Avideh
    Damm, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2014, 27 (01) : 7 - 13
  • [8] Insulin detemir: from concept to clinical experience
    Home, P
    Kurtzhals, P
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2006, 7 (03) : 325 - 343
  • [9] Imbergamo MP, 2012, G ITAL OSTET GINECOL, V34, P491
  • [10] Managing preexisting diabetes for pregnancy - Summary of evidence and consensus recommendations for care
    Kitzmiller, John L.
    Block, Jennifer M.
    Brown, Florence M.
    Catalano, Patrick M.
    Conway, Deborah L.
    Coustan, Donald R.
    Gunderson, Erica P.
    Herman, William H.
    Hoffman, Lisa D.
    Inturrisi, Maribeth
    Jovanovic, Lois B.
    Kjos, Siri I.
    Knopp, Robert H.
    Montoro, Martin N.
    Ogata, Edward S.
    Paramsothy, Pathmaja
    Reader, Diane M.
    Rosenn, Barak M.
    Thomas, Alyce M.
    Kirkman, M. Sue
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2008, 31 (05) : 1060 - 1079