The SNAP trial: a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a PEEK cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders: study protocol

被引:31
作者
Kersten, Roel F. M. R. [1 ]
van Gaalen, Steven M. [1 ]
Arts, Mark P. [2 ]
Roes, Kit C. B. [3 ]
de Gast, Arthur [1 ]
Corbin, Terry P. [4 ]
Oner, F. Cumhur [5 ]
机构
[1] Clin Orthopaed Res Ctr Midden Nederland CORC mN, Dept Orthopaed, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Med Ctr Haaglanden, Dept Neurosurg, The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Corbin & Co, Maple Grove, MN USA
[5] Univ Utrecht, Dept Orthopaed, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS | 2014年 / 15卷
关键词
Disc degeneration; Spondylolisthesis; Lumbar interbody fusion; PEEK; Silicon nitride; Ceramic implant; Randomized controlled trial; MORRIS DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE; STRUCTURAL ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; SPINAL-FUSION; BACK-PAIN; POLYETHERETHERKETONE; STABILITY; TITANIUM; ALLOGRAFT; STIFFNESS;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2474-15-57
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages have been widely used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disorders, and show good clinical results. Still, complications such as subsidence and migration of the cage are frequently seen. A lack of osteointegration and fibrous tissues surrounding PEEK cages are held responsible. Ceramic implants made of silicon nitride show better biocompatible and osteoconductive qualities, and therefore are expected to lower complication rates and allow for better fusion. Purpose of this study is to show that fusion with the silicon nitride cage produces non-inferior results in outcome of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire at all follow-up time points as compared to the same procedure with PEEK cages. Methods/Design: This study is designed as a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial with repeated measures analysis. 100 patients (18-75 years) presenting with symptomatic lumbar degenerative disorders unresponsive to at least 6 months of conservative treatment are included. Patients will be randomly assigned to a PEEK cage or a silicon nitride cage, and will undergo a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation. Primary outcome measure is the functional improvement measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Secondary outcome parameters are the VAS leg, VAS back, SF-36, Likert scale, neurological outcome and radiographic assessment of fusion. After 1 year the fusion rate will be measured by radiograms and CT. Follow-up will be continued for 2 years. Patients and clinical observers who will perform the follow-up visits will be blinded for type of cage used during follow-up. Analyses of radiograms and CT will be performed independently by two experienced radiologists. Discussion: In this study a PEEK cage will be compared with a silicon nitride cage in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders. To our knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial in which the silicon nitride cage is compared with the PEEK cage in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Spine biomechanics [J].
Adams, MA ;
Dolan, P .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2005, 38 (10) :1972-1983
[2]   The CASCADE trial: effectiveness of ceramic versus PEEK cages for anterior cervical discectomy with interbody fusion; protocol of a blinded randomized controlled trial [J].
Arts, Mark P. ;
Wolfs, Jasper F. C. ;
Corbin, Terry P. .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2013, 14
[3]   Orthopedic applications of silicon nitride ceramics [J].
Bal, B. S. ;
Rahaman, M. N. .
ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2012, 8 (08) :2889-2898
[4]   Fabrication and Testing of Silicon Nitride Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty Winner of the 2007 "HAP" PAUL Award [J].
Bal, B. Sonny ;
Khandkar, Ashok ;
Lakshminarayanan, R. ;
Clarke, Ian ;
Hoffman, Aaron A. ;
Rahaman, Mohamed N. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2009, 24 (01) :110-116
[5]   PSEUDOARTHROSIS RATE AFTER ALLOGRAFT POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WITH PEDICLE SCREW AND PLATE FIXATION [J].
BRANTIGAN, JW .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (11) :1271-1279
[6]   CHARACTERIZATION OF SHORT-FIBER REINFORCED THERMOPLASTICS FOR FRACTURE FIXATION DEVICES [J].
BROWN, SA ;
HASTINGS, RS ;
MASON, JJ ;
MOET, A .
BIOMATERIALS, 1990, 11 (08) :541-547
[7]   Long-term reduction in pain and disability after surgery with the interspinous device for intervertebral assisted motion (DIAM) spinal stabilization system in patients with low back pain: 4-year follow-up from a longitudinal prospective case series [J].
Buric, Josip ;
Pulidori, Massimiliano .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 (08) :1304-1311
[8]  
Burkus J K, 2001, Neurosurg Focus, V10, pE11
[9]  
Caron M, 1999, Clin Podiatr Med Surg, V16, P337
[10]   Comparison of polyetheretherketone cages with femoral cortical bone allograft as a single-piece interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [J].
Cutler, Aaron R. ;
Siddiqui, Saquib ;
Mohan, Avinash L. ;
Hillard, Virany H. ;
Cerabona, Franco ;
Das, Kaushik .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2006, 5 (06) :534-539