Determination of an optimal dosage regimen using a Bayesian decision analysis of efficacy and adverse effect data

被引:18
作者
Graham, G
Gupta, S
Aarons, L
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Ctr Appl Pharmacokinet Res, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] ALZA Corp, Mt View, CA USA
关键词
Bayesian analysis; decision analysis; nonlinear hierarchical models; optimal dosage regimen; pharmacodynamics; oxybutynin;
D O I
10.1023/A:1015720718875
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
One of the aims of Phase II clinical trials is to determine the dosage regimen(s) that will be investigated during a confirmatory Phase III clinical trial. During Phase II, pharmacodynamic data are collected that enables the efficacy and safety of the drug to be assessed. It is proposed in this paper to use Bayesian decision analysis to determine the optimal dosage regimen based on efficacy and toxicity of the drug oxybutynin used in the treatment of urinary urge incontinence. Such an approach results in a general framework allowing modeling, inference and decision making to be carried out. For oxybutynin, the repeated measurement efficacy and toxicity data were modeled using nonlinear hierarchical models and inferences were based on posterior probabilities. The optimal decision in this problem was to determine the dosage regimen that maximized the posterior expected utility given the prior information on the model parameters and the patient response data. The utility function was defined using clinical opinion on the satisfactory levels of efficacy and toxicity and then combined by weighting the relative importance of each pharmacodynamic response. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methodology implemented in WinBUGS 1.3 was used to obtain posterior estimates of the model parameters, probabilities and utilities.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 88
页数:22
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Beal SL., 1998, NONMEM Users Guides
[2]  
BERGER J. O., 2013, Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4757-4286-2, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-4286-2]
[3]  
DARGENIO DZ, 1998, BIOMED MEAS INFORM C, V2, P115
[4]   SAMPLING-BASED APPROACHES TO CALCULATING MARGINAL DENSITIES [J].
GELFAND, AE ;
SMITH, AFM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 85 (410) :398-409
[5]   A LANGUAGE AND PROGRAM FOR COMPLEX BAYESIAN MODELING [J].
GILKS, WR ;
THOMAS, A ;
SPIEGELHALTER, DJ .
STATISTICIAN, 1994, 43 (01) :169-177
[6]  
Gupta SK, 1999, J CLIN PHARMACOL, V39, P289
[7]   Quantitative characterization of therapeutic index: Application of mixed-effects modeling to evaluate oxybutynin dose-efficacy and dose-side effect relationships [J].
Gupta, SK ;
Sathyan, G ;
Lindemulder, EA ;
Ho, PL ;
Sheiner, LB ;
Aarons, L .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 65 (06) :672-684
[8]  
KIRKALI Z, 1987, International Urology and Nephrology, V19, P385, DOI 10.1007/BF02550355
[9]   NONLINEAR MIXED EFFECTS MODELS FOR REPEATED MEASURES DATA [J].
LINDSTROM, MJ ;
BATES, DM .
BIOMETRICS, 1990, 46 (03) :673-687
[10]   BUILDING POPULATION PHARMACOKINETIC PHARMACODYNAMIC MODELS .1. MODELS FOR COVARIATE EFFECTS [J].
MANDEMA, JW ;
VEROTTA, D ;
SHEINER, LB .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1992, 20 (05) :511-528