Exploring the Learning Effectiveness of "The STEAM Education of Flying and Assembly of Drone"

被引:10
作者
Chen, Ching-Ju [1 ]
Huang, Yueh-Min [2 ]
Chang, Chuan-Yu [1 ]
Liu, Yi-Chun [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Yunlin Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Comp Sci & Informat Engn, Touliu, Yunlin, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Engn Sci, Tainan, Taiwan
[3] Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Appl Foreign Languages, Tainan, Taiwan
来源
2018 SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION THROUGH TECHNOLOGY (EITT 2018) | 2018年
关键词
STEAM; (Science; Technology; Engineering; Art; Math); Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV); Creative Thinking; Innovative Teaching; Chicago Arts Partnership in Education (CAPE); USER ACCEPTANCE;
D O I
10.1109/EITT.2018.00021
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The course "The STEAM Education of Flying and Assembly of Drone" is designed for a total of 12 instructional hours. The course includes these modules: Drone Flight System, which has theory of flight and base knowledge; Simulation Flight of Drone; Innovative Applications in the Field of Drone; Assembly and Maintenance of Drone; Practical Flight of Drone; and using the "Flying Competition to check the effectiveness of learning. These modules establish a teaching paradigm and mechanism as a reference for other STEAM designs. This course integrates imagination, creativity, and innovation into the UAV STEAM, and the purpose is to cultivate students' innovative thinking, practical assembly ability, and active learning attitude. We use Chicago Arts Partnership in Education (CAPE), which is a four-stage cycle of reviewing and revising through the curriculum content and learning effectiveness. This process includes exploration, collaboration, documentation, and reflection to enrich teaching resources and the implementation of innovative knowledge. This way, imagination and innovative thinking can be properly integrated into the UAV STEAM curriculum. This will inspire students' imagination and creativity in learning.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 67
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Amabile T. M., 1996, Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1983, SOCIAL PSYCHOL CREAT, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-5533-8_3
[3]  
CAPE, 2007, CAPE ANN REP
[4]   USER ACCEPTANCE OF COMPUTER-TECHNOLOGY - A COMPARISON OF 2 THEORETICAL-MODELS [J].
DAVIS, FD ;
BAGOZZI, RP ;
WARSHAW, PR .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1989, 35 (08) :982-1003
[6]  
Hennessery B. A, 1998, NATURE CREATIVITY CO
[7]  
Hocevar D., 1989, TAXONOMY CRITIQUE ME
[8]   A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students [J].
Hwang, Gwo-Jen ;
Chang, Hsun-Fang .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2011, 56 (04) :1023-1031
[9]  
Likert R., 1932, ARCHIV PSYCHOL, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1540-5834.2010.00585.X
[10]  
Perego Danielle, 2011, RUSSIAN PSYCHOL L VY