Morphometric integration and modularity in configurations of landmarks: tools for evaluating a priori hypotheses

被引:395
作者
Klingenberg, Christian Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Fac Life Sci, Manchester M13 9PT, Lancs, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; COMPLEX MORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURES; DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER; WING SHAPE; GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS; DEVELOPMENTAL INTEGRATION; MANDIBULAR MORPHOLOGY; FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY; STATISTICAL APPROACH; VECTOR CORRELATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1525-142X.2009.00347.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Identifying the modular components of a configuration of landmarks is an important task of morphometric analyses in evolutionary developmental biology. Modules are integrated internally by many interactions among their component parts, but are linked to one another only by few or weak interactions. Accordingly, traits within modules are tightly correlated with each other, but relatively independent of traits in other modules. Hypotheses concerning the boundaries of modules in a landmark configuration can therefore be tested by comparing the strength of covariation alternative partitions of the configuration into subsets of landmarks. If a subdivision coincides with the true boundaries between modules, the correlations among subsets should be minimal. This article introduces Escoufier's RV coefficient and the multi-set RV coefficient as measures of the correlation between two or more subsets of landmarks. These measures can be compared between alternative partitions of the configuration into subsets. Because developmental interactions are tissue bound, it is sensible to require that modules should be spatially contiguous. I propose a criterion for spatial contiguity for sets of landmarks using an adjacency graph. The new methods are demonstrated with data on shape of the wing in Drosophila melanogaster and the mandible of the house mouse.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 421
页数:17
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Ontogenetic integration of the hominoid face [J].
Ackermann, RR .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION, 2005, 48 (02) :175-197
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1976, J R Stat Soc CAppl, DOI DOI 10.2307/2347233
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses
[4]   EVOLUTIONARY DIVERGENCE, SHAPE CHANGE, AND GENETIC CORRELATION STRUCTURE IN THE RODENT MANDIBLE [J].
ATCHLEY, WR ;
COWLEY, DE ;
VOGL, C ;
MCLELLAN, T .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 1992, 41 (02) :196-221
[5]   A MODEL FOR DEVELOPMENT AND EVOLUTION OF COMPLEX MORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURES [J].
ATCHLEY, WR ;
HALL, BK .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1991, 66 (02) :101-157
[6]  
ATCHLEY WR, 1985, GENETICS, V111, P555
[7]   Hierarchical nature of morphological integration and modularity in the human posterior face [J].
Bastir, M ;
Rosas, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2005, 128 (01) :26-34
[8]   Correlated variation between the lateral basicranium and the face: A geometric morphometric study in different human groups [J].
Bastir, Markus ;
Rosas, Antonio .
ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (09) :814-824
[9]   Genetic variation for the positioning of wing veins in Drosophila melanogaster [J].
Birdsall, K ;
Zimmerman, E ;
Teeter, K ;
Gibson, G .
EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 2 (01) :16-24
[10]  
Bolker JA, 2000, AM ZOOL, V40, P770, DOI 10.1668/0003-1569(2000)040[0770:MIDAWI]2.0.CO