Variations in genetic structure and male genitalia suggest recent lineage diversification in the Neotropical dung beetle complex Canthon cyanellus (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae)

被引:12
作者
Nolasco-Soto, Janet [1 ]
Favila, Mario E. [2 ]
Espinosa de los Monteros, Alejandro [1 ]
Gonzalez-Astorga, Jorge [1 ]
Halffter, Gonzalo [2 ]
Valdez-Carrasco, Jorge [3 ]
Ari Noriega, Jorge [4 ]
Galante, Eduardo [5 ]
机构
[1] Inst Ecol AC, Red Biol Evolut, Carretera Antigua Coatepec 351, Xalapa 91070, Veracruz, Mexico
[2] Inst Ecol AC, Red Ecoetol, Carretera Antigua Coatepec 351, Xalapa 91070, Veracruz, Mexico
[3] Colegio Postgrad, Montecillo, Texcoco, Mexico
[4] Univ Los Andes, Lab Zool & Ecol Acuat LAZOEA, Bogota, Colombia
[5] Univ Alicante, Ctr Iberoamer Biodiversidad CIBIO, Carretera San Vicente del Raspeig S-N, Alicante 03690, Spain
关键词
aedeagus morphology; allopatric populations; morphological variation; phylogeny; COLEOPTERA SCARABAEIDAE; SPECIES COLEOPTERA; EVOLUTION; MORPHOLOGY; RECOGNITION; DELTOCHILUM; CHARACTERS; REVISION; INSIGHTS; SIZE;
D O I
10.1093/biolinnean/blaa131
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We analysed the genetic divergence and morphology of the aedeagus (i.e. phallobase and parameres) in Canthon cyanellus at different geographical levels. The results from both approaches were compared with the current taxonomic assignment of the C. cyanellus complex, which includes three subspecies. We found a high variation in all the morphological characters of the aedeagus in the populations analysed; the morphometric variation was not geographically structured, either by population or by region. The genealogical analysis indicates a significant genetic structure that does not match either the morphological variation in the male genitalia or the previous subspecific taxonomic classification. Our results suggest that the morphological variation of the aedeagus is seemingly not an isolating reproductive barrier and that the intra-and interpopulation morphological variability of the aedeagus in the C. cyanellus complex does not permit the division into several species. We suggest that other evolutionary forces, such as genetic drift and sexual selection, have influenced the evolution of the male genitalia and the incipient differentiation of this species complex.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 520
页数:16
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, TRACER V 1 6
[2]  
Antonio-Hernandez E., 2018, BIOCYT BIOL CIENC TE, V11, P824, DOI [10.22201/fesi.20072082.2018.11.67517, DOI 10.22201/FESI.20072082.2018.11.67517]
[3]   Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection [J].
Arnqvist, G .
NATURE, 1998, 393 (6687) :784-786
[4]  
González FA, 2009, REV COLOMB ENTOMOL, V35, P253
[5]   Neotectonic evolution of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec (southeastern Mexico) [J].
Barrier, E ;
Velasquillo, L ;
Chavez, M ;
Gaulon, R .
TECTONOPHYSICS, 1998, 287 (1-4) :77-96
[6]   DISCRIMINATION OF ALL MEMBERS OF THE ANOPHELESPUNCTULATUS COMPLEX BY POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION RESTRICTION-FRAGMENT-LENGTH-POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS [J].
BEEBE, NW ;
SAUL, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 1995, 53 (05) :478-481
[7]  
Blackwelder Richard E., 1944, U S NATION MUS BULL, V185, P189
[8]   EVOLUTION OF MALE AND FEMALE GENITALIA FOLLOWING RELEASE FROM SEXUAL SELECTION [J].
Cayetano, Luis ;
Maklakov, Alexei A. ;
Brooks, Robert C. ;
Bonduriansky, Russell .
EVOLUTION, 2011, 65 (08) :2171-2183
[9]   TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies [J].
Clement, M ;
Posada, D ;
Crandall, KA .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2000, 9 (10) :1657-1659
[10]  
D'HOTMAN D, 1990, Elytron (Barcelona), V4, P3