Electrical stimulation rate effects on speech perception in cochlear implants

被引:28
作者
Arora, Komal [1 ]
Dawson, Pam [2 ]
Dowell, Richard [1 ]
Vandali, Andrew [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Otolaryngol, Melbourne 3002, Australia
[2] HEARing Cooperat Res Ctr CRC, Melbourne, Australia
关键词
Cochlear implant; Electrical stimulation rate; Speech perception; CODING STRATEGY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1080/14992020902858967
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to explore cochlear implant users' speech perception performance in quiet and in noise for low to moderate stimulation rates. Eight postlingually deaf adult users of the Nucleus CI24 cochlear implant (contour electrode array) using the ESPrit 3G speech processor participated in this study. Monosyllabic word recognition in quiet and sentence perception in noise was evaluated for low to moderate stimulation rates of 275, 350, 500, and 900 pulses-per-second/channel (pps/ch). All four stimulation rate programs were balanced for loudness. A repeated ABCD experimental design was employed. Take home practice was provided with each stimulation rate. Subjects also responded to a comparative questionnaire to examine their rate preference for a variety of listening situations. Results for six of the eight subjects showed no significant effect of rate for monosyllables in quiet. However, results for the sentence test in noise demonstrated improvements with 500 or 900 pps/ch stimulation rates in seven out of the eight subjects. Although there was not a close relationship between each subject's subjective preference and the rate program that provided best speech perception, most subjects indicated a preference for 500 pps/ch rate in noise.
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 567
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1972, A Speech Intelligibility Test for Deaf Children
  • [2] Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial
    Balkany, Thomas
    Hodges, Annelle
    Menapace, Christine
    Hazard, Linda
    Driscoll, Colin
    Gantz, Bruce
    Kelsall, David
    Luxford, William
    McMenomy, Sean
    Neely, J. Gail
    Peters, Brian
    Pillsbury, Harold
    Roberson, Joseph
    Schramm, David
    Telian, Steven
    Waltzman, Susan
    Westerberg, Brian
    Payne, Stacy
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2007, 136 (05) : 757 - 762
  • [3] *COCHL LTD, 2007, SEL STIM RAT NUCL FR
  • [4] Dreschler WA, 2001, AUDIOLOGY, V40, P148
  • [5] PHASE-LOCKING OF AUDITORY-NERVE DISCHARGES TO SINUSOIDAL ELECTRIC-STIMULATION OF THE COCHLEA
    DYNES, SBC
    DELGUTTE, B
    [J]. HEARING RESEARCH, 1992, 58 (01) : 79 - 90
  • [6] Effects of stimulation rate on speech recognition with cochlear implants
    Friesen, LM
    Shannon, RV
    Cruz, RJ
    [J]. AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2005, 10 (03) : 169 - 184
  • [7] Henshall K R, 2001, J Am Acad Audiol, V12, P478
  • [8] Effects of stimulation rate with the nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy
    Holden, LK
    Skinner, MW
    Holden, TA
    Demorest, ME
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2002, 23 (05) : 463 - 476
  • [9] Optimized speech understanding with the continuous interleaved sampling speech coding strategy in patients with cochlear implants: Effect of variations in stimulation rate and number of channels
    Kiefer, J
    von Ilberg, C
    Rupprecht, V
    Hubner-Egner, J
    Knecht, R
    [J]. ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2000, 109 (11) : 1009 - 1020
  • [10] The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding
    Loizou, PC
    Poroy, O
    Dorman, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2000, 108 (02) : 790 - 802