MNEs' corporate social responsibility: an optimal investment decision model

被引:14
|
作者
Oh, Won-Yong [1 ]
Choi, Kyoung Jin [2 ]
Chang, Young Kyun [3 ]
Jeon, Moo-Kyeong [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Lee Business Sch, 4505 S Maryland Pkwy, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
[2] Univ Calgary, Haskayne Sch Business, 2500 Univ Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[3] Sogang Univ, Sogang Business Sch, 35 Baekbeom Ro, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
CSR; corporate social responsibility; optimal investment; expected return; payoff uncertainty; multi-level perspective; REAL OPTIONS; MULTINATIONAL-ENTERPRISE; INTERNATIONAL-BUSINESS; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; INSTITUTIONAL THEORY; STAKEHOLDER THEORY; CSR; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGY; SUBSIDIARIES;
D O I
10.1504/EJIM.2019.099422
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Based on an assumption that corporate social responsibility (CSR) is an investment decision, we provide a theoretical model that suggests how multinational enterprises (MNEs) should optimally invest in CSR. Our model proposes the optimal timing (when) and level (how much) of CSR investment with an economic calculation of expected return and payoff uncertainty of CSR in local markets. We also specify various multi-level factors (i.e. individual, organisation, industry, and institution) that may affect the investment structure. Our model suggests that MNEs' CSR decisions can be understood as a strategic investment seeking the optimal economic outcomes depending on the expected return and payoff uncertainty in each foreign affiliate. This study contributes to the literature by integrating research streams that have been polarised over the issue of the necessity of CSR for MNEs, and by offering a more complete understanding of how MNEs should invest in CSR.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 327
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders influence on MNEs' activities
    Park, Byung Il
    Chidlow, Agnieszka
    Choi, Jiyul
    INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2014, 23 (05) : 966 - 980
  • [2] Corporate Social Responsibility in SMEs and MNEs. The Different Strategic Decision Making
    Mousiolis, Dimosthenis T.
    Zaridis, Apostolos D.
    Karamanis, Kostas
    Rontogianni, Athina
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRATEGIC INNOVATIVE MARKETING (IC-SIM 2014), 2015, 175 : 579 - 583
  • [3] Corporate Social Responsibility in International Business: Illustrations from Korean and Japanese Electronics MNEs in Indonesia
    Park, Young-Ryeol
    Song, Sangcheol
    Choe, Soonkyoo
    Baik, Youjin
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2015, 129 (03) : 747 - 761
  • [4] Timing corporate social responsibility investments: A dynamic investment model and empirical evidence
    Kupfer, Stefan
    Prysyazhna, Vladlena
    Lukas, Elmar
    Moells, Sascha
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2025, 143
  • [5] Investment Inefficiency and Corporate Social Responsibility
    Engida, Tadesse Getacher
    Parmeter, Christopher F.
    Rao, Xudong
    Lansink, Alfons G. J. M. Oude
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2022, 58 (1) : 95 - 108
  • [6] Corporate Social Responsibility and Investment Efficiency
    Benlemlih, Mohammed
    Bitar, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 148 (03) : 647 - 671
  • [7] The optimal level of corporate social responsibility based on the duopoly model
    Chen, Junlong
    Sun, Chaoqun
    Liu, Jiali
    Huo, Yan
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2021, 42 (01) : 177 - 184
  • [8] Corporate Social Responsibility in Pakistan: A Legal Perspective with Reference to MNEs
    Yu, Shuhong
    Zia-ud-Din, Malik
    Dilawer, Roy
    Ban, Xiaohui
    JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND LAW, 2019, 12 (03) : 87 - 104
  • [9] Corporate Social Responsibility and Gender Diversity: Insights from Asia Pacific
    Yasser, Qaiser Rafique
    Al Mamun, Abdullah
    Ahmed, Irfan
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 24 (03) : 210 - 221
  • [10] Investment Inefficiency and Corporate Social Responsibility
    Tadesse Getacher Engida
    Christopher F. Parmeter
    Xudong Rao
    Alfons G.J.M. Oude Lansink
    Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2022, 58 : 95 - 108