Winners and losers of organic cereal farming in animal communities across Central and Northern Europe

被引:36
作者
Birkhofer, K. [1 ]
Ekroos, J. [2 ]
Corlett, E. B. [1 ]
Smith, H. G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Biol, S-22362 Lund, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Res, S-22362 Lund, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Agri-environment schemes; Biodiversity conservation; Climate; Land-use intensity; Rare species; Taxonomic distinctness; AGRI-ENVIRONMENT SCHEMES; DIFFERENT SPATIAL SCALES; LAND-USE INTENSITY; TAXONOMIC DISTINCTNESS; SPECIES-RICHNESS; LANDSCAPE HETEROGENEITY; BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL; PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY; FARMLAND BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT INTENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2014.04.014
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Organic farming is promoted as a sustainable alternative to conventional farming, with positive effects on the diversity of plants and selected animal taxa. Here, we used a literature survey to collect presence/absence data on the composition of farmland bird, ground beetle, spider as well as butterfly and moth communities from 28 independent studies to identify genera and (sub-)families that had either higher (winners) or lower (losers) species richness under organic farming. We further tested if the taxonomic breadth of communities and the number of species of conservation concern differed between farming systems and if climate or fertilization intensity altered responses of animal communities to organic farming. Our results suggest that there are both winners and losers of organic farming and that this effect depends on whether taxa are predaceous (losers) or exclusively feed on plant material (winners). Organic farming did not lead to a higher number of exclusive species, but significantly more species of conservation concern were observed under organic farming. Organic farming consistently led to a slightly higher taxonomic breadth of bird communities. Finally, we did not find support that local long-term climatic conditions or differences in fertilization rates between farming systems altered the effect of organic farming. Overall, we did not find strong support for general positive effects of organic farming on animal diversity in the analysed groups across Central and Northern Europe. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 33
页数:9
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [51] On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe
    Kleijn, D.
    Kohler, F.
    Baldi, A.
    Batary, P.
    Concepcion, E. D.
    Clough, Y.
    Diaz, M.
    Gabriel, D.
    Holzschuh, A.
    Knop, E.
    Kovacs, A.
    Marshall, E. J. P.
    Tscharntke, T.
    Verhulst, J.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 276 (1658) : 903 - 909
  • [52] Does conservation on farmland contribute to halting the biodiversity decline?
    Kleijn, David
    Rundlof, Maj
    Scheper, Jeroen
    Smith, Henrik G.
    Tscharntke, Teja
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2011, 26 (09) : 474 - 481
  • [53] Field-breeding birds on organic and conventional arable farms in the Netherlands
    Kragten, Steven
    de Snoo, Geert R.
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 126 (3-4) : 270 - 274
  • [54] Decreased Functional Diversity and Biological Pest Control in Conventional Compared to Organic Crop Fields
    Krauss, Jochen
    Gallenberger, Iris
    Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (05):
  • [55] Carabid beetles in sustainable agriculture: a review on pest control efficacy, cultivation impacts and enhancement
    Kromp, B
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 74 (1-3) : 187 - 228
  • [56] LEGENDRE L., 1983, NUMERICAL ECOLOGY
  • [57] Pest damage and arthropod community structure in organic vs. conventional tomato production in California
    Letourneau, DK
    Goldstein, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2001, 38 (03) : 557 - 570
  • [58] Neumann H., 2006, P EUR JOINT ORG C, P42
  • [59] Paschetta M, 2012, ZOOL STUD, V51, P1175
  • [60] Pimentel D, 2005, BIOSCIENCE, V55, P573, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0573:EEAECO]2.0.CO