Absolute calibration of the Gamma Knife® Perfexion™ and delivered dose verification using EPR/alanine dosimetry

被引:6
作者
Hornbeck, Amaury [1 ]
Garcia, Tristan [1 ]
Cuttat, Marguerite [2 ]
Jenny, Catherine [2 ]
机构
[1] CEA, Lab Natl Henri Becquerel, LIST, F-91191 Gif Sur Yvette, France
[2] Univ Hosp Pitie Salpetriere, Dept Radiotherapy, Med Phys Unit, F-75013 Paris, France
关键词
Gamma Knife; EPR; alanine; dosimetry; calibration; ALANINE DOSIMETRY; IRRADIATION TEMPERATURE; ADVANCEMENTS; ACCURACY; PHANTOM; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1118/1.4873686
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Elekta Leksell Gamma Knife (R) (LGK) is a radiotherapy beam machine whose features are not compliant with the international calibration protocols for radiotherapy. In this scope, the Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel and the Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital decided to conceive a new LKG dose calibration method and to compare it with the currently used one. Furthermore, the accuracy of the dose delivered by the LGK machine was checked using an "end-to-end" test. This study also aims to compare doses delivered by the two latest software versions of the Gammaplan treatment planning system (TPS). Methods: The dosimetric method chosen is the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) of alanine. Dose rate (calibration) verification was done without TPS using a spherical phantom. Absolute calibration was done with factors calculated by Monte Carlo simulation (MCNP-X). For "end-to-end" test, irradiations in an anthropomorphic head phantom, close to real treatment conditions, are done using the TPS in order to verify the delivered dose. Results: The comparison of the currently used calibration method with the new one revealed a deviation of +0.8% between the dose rates measured by ion chamber and EPR/alanine. For simple fields configuration (less than 16 mm diameter), the "end-to-end" tests showed out average deviations of -1.7% and -0.9% between the measured dose and the calculated dose by Gammaplan v9 and v10, respectively. Conclusions: This paper shows there is a good agreement between the new calibration method and the currently used one. There is also a good agreement between the calculated and delivered doses especially for Gammaplan v10. (C) 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] AHLERS FJ, 1991, RADIAT PROT DOSIM, V37, P117
  • [2] A new formalism for reference dosimetry of small and nonstandard fields
    Alfonso, R.
    Andreo, P.
    Capote, R.
    Huq, M. Saiful
    Kilby, W.
    Kjaell, P.
    Mackie, T. R.
    Palmans, H.
    Rosser, K.
    Seuntjens, J.
    Ullrich, W.
    Vatnitsky, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (11) : 5179 - 5186
  • [3] Alfonso R., 2008, METROLOGIA S06004, V35, P5179
  • [4] Almond P. R., 1999, IAEA TECHNICAL REPOR, V26, P1847
  • [5] AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams
    Almond, PR
    Biggs, PJ
    Coursey, BM
    Hanson, WF
    Huq, MS
    Nath, R
    Rogers, DWO
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (09) : 1847 - 1870
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1995, JCGM100 GUID EXPR UN
  • [7] A study of the irradiation temperature coefficient for L-alanine and DL-alanine dosemeters
    Desrosiers, Marc F.
    Lin, Min
    Cooper, Sarenee L.
    Cui, Ying
    Chen, Kesheng
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2006, 120 (1-4) : 235 - 237
  • [8] A methodology for choosing parameters for ESR readout of alanine dosimeters for radiotherapy
    Garcia, T.
    Lin, M.
    Pasquie, I.
    Lourenco, V.
    [J]. RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2009, 78 (09) : 782 - 790
  • [9] Dose verification and calibration of the Cyberknife® by EPR/alanine dosimetry
    Garcia, Tristan
    Lacornerie, Thomas
    Popoff, Romain
    Lourenco, Valerie
    Bordy, Jean-Marc
    [J]. RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2011, 46 (09) : 952 - 957
  • [10] Kuntz F., 1998, J OFFIC REPUBL FRANC, V95, P796