Endoscopic Incision of Short (<3 cm) Urethral Strictures After Phallic Reconstruction

被引:17
作者
Lumen, Nicolaas [1 ]
Oosterlinck, Willem [1 ]
Decaestecker, Karel [1 ]
Monstrey, Stan [2 ]
Hoebeke, Piet [1 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
INTERNAL URETHROTOMY; URETHROPLASTY; DILATION;
D O I
10.1089/end.2008.0666
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Urethral stricture formation is a frequent complication after phallic reconstruction, but little is known about the treatment. Endoscopic cold-knife incision has long been applied for short urethral strictures. Can this treatment be used for strictures in the phalloplasty patients as well? Materials and Methods: Thirty-two endoscopic urethrotomies were done in 22 patients with a phalloplasty. Only noncomplicated strictures shorter than 3 cm were considered appropriate for endoscopic incision. The stricture was treated by a cold-knife incision. The urethral catheter was maintained for at least 2 weeks. Followup was done every 3 months during the first year and annually thereafter. Comparing failures with successful cases, prognostic factors for success are assessed. Results: Median follow-up is 51 months ( range, 8-95 months). In 14 patients, no previous intervention was done. Mean stricture length is 1 cm ( range, 0.5-2.5 cm). Endoscopic incision was successful in 14/32 cases ( 43.8%). First incision was successful in 10/22 cases ( 45.5%), a second incision was successful in 4/7 cases ( 57.1%), but three or more incisions were never successful ( 0/3). The only significant difference between failures and successful cases is the interval between phalloplasty and endoscopic incision ( 32 vs. 9.9 months; p = 0.00008). Conclusions: Endoscopic incision for short (< 3 cm) urethral strictures after phallic reconstruction can solve the problem in about half of the cases. Three or more incisions seem to be useless. Endoscopic incision is significantly better when performed with a long-term interval after phalloplasty, indicating that a well-healed phallic urethra is more prone to a successful endoscopic incision.
引用
收藏
页码:1329 / 1332
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Long-term results of internal urethrotomy [J].
Albers, P ;
Fichtner, J ;
Bruhl, P ;
Muller, SC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (05) :1611-1614
[2]   Treatment of urethral stricture in a female-to-male transsexual with a tubulized flap from the labia minora [J].
Cavadas, PC ;
Landin, L .
JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2005, 21 (03) :153-156
[3]   ENDOSCOPIC INTERNAL URETHROTOMY FOR TREATMENT OF URETHRAL STRICTURES - MIDTERM SURVEY [J].
FOURCADE, RO ;
MATHIEU, F ;
CHATELAIN, C ;
JARDIN, A ;
RICHARD, F ;
KUSS, R .
UROLOGY, 1981, 18 (01) :33-36
[4]   Treatment of male urethral strictures: Is repeated dilation or internal urethrotomy useful? [J].
Heyns, CF ;
Steenkamp, JW ;
De Kock, MLS ;
Whitaker, P .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (02) :356-358
[5]   DIRECT VISION INTERNAL URETHROTOMY - A CRITICAL-REVIEW OF 365 OPERATIONS [J].
HOLMNIELSEN, A ;
SCHULTZ, A ;
MOLLERPEDERSEN, V .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1984, 56 (03) :308-312
[6]   VISUAL INTERNAL URETHROTOMY [J].
JOHNSTON, SR ;
BAGSHAW, HA ;
FLYNN, JT ;
KELLETT, MJ ;
BLANDY, JP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1980, 52 (06) :542-545
[7]   Urethroplasty following total phallic reconstruction [J].
Levine, LA ;
Elterman, L .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (02) :378-382
[8]   Phalloplasty: A valuable treatment for males with penile insufficiency [J].
Lumen, Nicolaas ;
Monstrey, Stanislas ;
Selvaggi, Gennaro ;
Ceulemans, Peter ;
De Cupere, Griet ;
Van Laecke, Eric ;
Hoebeke, Piet .
UROLOGY, 2008, 71 (02) :272-276
[9]   Radial forearm phalloplasty: A review of 81 cases [J].
Monstrey S. ;
Hoebeke P. ;
Dhont M. ;
Selvaggi G. ;
Hamdi M. ;
Van Landuyt K. ;
Blondeel Ph. .
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2005, 28 (3) :206-212
[10]   What is the place of internal urethrotomy in the treatment of urethral stricture disease? [J].
Naudé, AM ;
Heyns, CF .
NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2005, 2 (11) :538-545