Emotion intensity modulates perspective taking in men and women: an event-related potential study

被引:2
作者
Luo, Pinchao [1 ]
Xu, Danna [1 ]
Huang, Fengjuan [1 ]
Wei, Fang [2 ]
机构
[1] South China Normal Univ, Key Lab Mental Hlth & Cognit Sci Guangdong Prov, Ctr Studies Psychol Applicat, Dept Appl Psychol,Sch Psychol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Ordos Hlth Sch, Ordos, Peoples R China
关键词
emotional intensity; empathy; event-related potentials; perspective taking; sex; GENDER SIMILARITIES; SEX-DIFFERENCES; EMPATHY; SELF; FEEL;
D O I
10.1097/WNR.0000000000001030
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
When empathizing with another individual, one can imagine the individual's emotional states and how he or she perceives a situation. However, it is not known to what extent imagining the other differs from imagining oneself under different emotional intensity situations in both sexes. The present study investigated the regulatory effect of emotional intensity on perspective taking in men and women by event-related potentials. The participants were shown pictures of individuals in highly negative (HN), moderately negative, and neutral situations, and instructed to imagine the degree of pain perceived from either a self-perspective or an other-perspective. The results showed that there was no N2 differentiation between the self-perspective and other-perspective under all conditions. Nor was there late positive potential differentiation under moderately negative and neutral conditions in either sex. In contrast, late positive potential induced by HN pictures under the self-perspective was significantly larger than that under the other-perspective only in women. These results suggested that women tended to overestimate the pain of HN stimuli from a self-perspective than from an other-perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 778
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1999, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology
  • [2] Batson CD, 1997, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V73, P517
  • [3] Do We Feel the Same Empathy for Loved and Hated Peers?
    Bucchioni, Giulia
    Lelard, Thierry
    Ahmaidi, Said
    Godefroy, Olivier
    Krystkowiak, Pierre
    Mouras, Harold
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (05):
  • [4] MEASURING INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN EMPATHY - EVIDENCE FOR A MULTIDIMENSIONAL APPROACH
    DAVIS, MH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 44 (01) : 113 - 126
  • [5] A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy
    Decety, Jean
    Jackson, Philip L.
    [J]. CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 15 (02) : 54 - 58
  • [6] Decety Jean, 2004, Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, V3, P71, DOI 10.1177/1534582304267187
  • [7] Physicians down-regulate their pain empathy response: An event-related brain potential study
    Decety, Jean
    Yang, Chia-Yan
    Cheng, Yawei
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 50 (04) : 1676 - 1682
  • [8] Temporoparietal Junction Hypoactivity during Pain-Related Empathy Processing in Adolescents with Conduct Disorder
    Dong, Daifeng
    Ming, Qingsen
    Wang, Xiang
    Yu, Weixia
    Jiang, Yali
    Wu, Qiong
    Gao, Yidian
    Yao, Shuqiao
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 7
  • [9] Pre-reflective and reflective self-reference: A spatiotemporal EEG analysis
    Esslen, Michaela
    Metzler, Sibylle
    Pascual-Marqui, Roberto
    Jancke, Lutz
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2008, 42 (01) : 437 - 449
  • [10] Gerace A., 2015, J RELATIONSHIPS RES, V6, P1