Cell-Based Meat and Firms' Environmental Strategies: New Rationales as per Available Literature

被引:13
作者
Reis, Germano Glufke [1 ]
Heidemann, Marina Sucha [2 ]
Matos, Katherine Helena Oliveira de [3 ]
Molento, Carla Forte Maiolino [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Parana, Sch Business Adm, Av Prefeito Lothario Meissner 632, BR-80210170 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Parana, Anim Welf Lab, Rua Funcionarios 1540, BR-80035050 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[3] Good Food Inst Brazil, Ave Paulista 807,Cj 2315, BR-01311100 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
cell-based meat; environmental strategies; startup; value chain; IN-VITRO MEAT; CULTURED MEAT; ARTIFICIAL MEAT; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; ECO-EFFICIENCY; STEM-CELLS; CHALLENGES; FUTURE; CONSUMPTION; ATTITUDE;
D O I
10.3390/su12229418
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Higher demand for meat production and limited inputs, as well as environmental and animal ethics issues, are bringing alternative protein sources to the market, such as cell-based meat (CBM), i.e., meat produced through cell culturing, without involving animal raising and killing. Although the potential social and environmental benefits of the technology have been recently addressed in the blossoming CBM literature, little has been discussed about the possible implications for the environmental strategies of firms that are entering the new cell-based production chain. Thus, drawing on the theoretical framework of competitive environmental strategies and a systematic review of the literature, we discuss prospects for cell-based meat regarding the possible adoption of environmental strategies by firms that are entering the CBM chain. The technology may be considered a potential means for mitigating most of the environmental impacts of large-scale meat production, e.g., extensive land use and greenhouse gas emissions. We discuss how such benefits and consumer attitudes towards cultivated meat could encourage the adoption of environmental strategies by firms, and the roles that value chain firms are likely to play in those strategies in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Aleph Farms, 2020, NAT DES
[2]  
Aleph Farms, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY
[3]   Could consumption of insects, cultured meat or imitation meat reduce global agricultural land use? [J].
Alexander, Peter ;
Brown, Calum ;
Arneth, Almut ;
Dias, Clare ;
Finnigan, John ;
Moran, Dominic ;
Rounsevell, Mark D. A. .
GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 15 :22-32
[4]   Bioprocess Design Considerations for Cultured Meat Production With a Focus on the Expansion Bioreactor [J].
Allan, Scott J. ;
De Bank, Paul A. ;
Ellis, Marianne J. .
FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2019, 3
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1980, TECHNIQUES ANAL IND
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SUSTAINABILITY STRAT
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Livestock's long shadow: environmen
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture Systems (SAFA)
[9]   Boosting the productivity and profitability of northern Australian beef enterprises: Exploring innovation options using simulation modelling and systems analysis [J].
Ash, Andrew ;
Hunt, Leigh ;
McDonald, Cam ;
Scanlan, Joe ;
Bell, Lindsay ;
Cowley, Robyn ;
Watson, Ian ;
McIvor, John ;
MacLeod, Neil .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2015, 139 :50-65
[10]   Explicit and implicit attitude toward an emerging food technology: The case of cultured meat [J].
Bekker, Gerben A. ;
Fischer, Arnout R. H. ;
Tobi, Hilde ;
van Trijp, Hans C. M. .
APPETITE, 2017, 108 :245-254