Treatment Outcomes in Patients Treated With Galcanezumab vs Placebo: Post Hoc Analyses From a Phase 3 Randomized Study in Patients With Episodic Cluster Headache

被引:7
作者
Kudrow, David [1 ]
Andrews, J. Scott [2 ]
Rettiganti, Mallikarjuna [2 ]
Oakes, Tina [2 ]
Bardos, Jennifer [2 ]
Gaul, Charly [3 ]
Riesenberg, Robert [4 ]
Wenzel, Richard [2 ]
Kuruppu, Dulanji [2 ]
Martinez, James [2 ]
机构
[1] Calif Med Clin Headache, Santa Monica, CA USA
[2] Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[3] Migraine & Headache Clin, Koenigstein, Germany
[4] Atlanta Ctr Med Res, Atlanta, GA USA
来源
HEADACHE | 2020年 / 60卷 / 10期
关键词
episodic cluster headache; patient‐ reported outcomes; acute medication use frequency; time‐ to‐ first occurrence; responder threshold; responder rate; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GUIDELINES; IMPAIRMENT; MIGRAINE;
D O I
10.1111/head.14011
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Cluster headache (CH) is a highly disabling primary headache disorder. To date, characterization of outcomes in the preventive treatment of episodic CH, including precise definitions of clinically meaningful attack frequency reduction and impact on acute treatment management, is lacking. Methods This was a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients (men or women aged 18-65 years) diagnosed with episodic CH as defined by the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3 beta criteria. In this post hoc analysis, we evaluated the median time-to-first occurrence of >= 50, >= 75, or 100% reduction from baseline in CH attack frequency, and impact on acute medication use. An anchor-based assessment of clinically relevant attack frequency reduction using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scores at Week 4 was also assessed. Results The median time-to-first occurrence of >= 50, >= 75, or 100% reduction from baseline in CH attacks was consistently shorter (9-10 days sooner) with galcanezumab vs placebo (median [95% confidence interval, 95% CI]: >= 50%, 5 days [4.0 to 7.0] vs 14 days [6.0 to 19.0]; >= 75%, 11 days [7.0 to 16.0] vs 21 days [13.0 to 26.0]; 100%, 22 days [16.0 to 37.0] vs 32 days [23.0 to 34.0]). Mean reduction from baseline in the overall frequency of weekly pooled acute medication use across Weeks 1-3 was significantly greater with galcanezumab vs placebo (11.0 vs 5.5; odds ratio, OR [95% CI]: 5.52 [1.02, 10.01]; P value = .017). Patients reporting "much better" on the PGI-I experienced a median weekly CH attack reduction of approximately 43% from baseline across Weeks 1-3. The overall odds of achieving an attack reduction threshold of 43% across Weeks 1-3 was significantly higher with galcanezumab vs placebo (Weeks 1-3: OR [95% CI], 2.60 [1.3 to 5.3]). Conclusions Faster median time-to-first occurrence of response rates, lower frequency of pooled acute medications use, and a greater proportion of patients achieving a response anchored by patient-reported improvement were observed for galcanezumab vs placebo.
引用
收藏
页码:2254 / 2264
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version)
    Bes, Andre
    Kunkel, Robert
    Lance, James W.
    Nappi, Giuseppe
    Pfaffenrath, Volker
    Rose, Frank Clifford
    Schoenberg, Bruce S.
    Soyka, Dieter
    Tfelt-Hansen, Peer
    Welch, K. Michael A.
    Wilkinson, Marica
    Olesen, Jes
    Bousser, Marie-Germaine
    Diener, Hans-Christoph
    Dodick, David
    First, Michael
    Goadsby, Peter J.
    Goebel, Hartmut
    Lainez, Miguel J. A.
    Lance, James W.
    Lipton, Richard B.
    Nappi, Giuseppe
    Sakai, Fumihiko
    Schoenen, Jean
    Silberstein, Stephen D.
    Steiner, Timothy J.
    Olesen, Jes
    Bendtsen, Lars
    Dodick, David
    Ducros, Anne
    Evers, Stefan
    First, Michael
    Goadsby, Peter J.
    Hershey, Andrew
    Katsarava, Zaza
    Levin, Morris
    Pascual, Julio
    Russell, Michael B.
    Schwedt, Todd
    Steiner, Timothy J.
    Tassorelli, Cristina
    Terwindt, Gisela M.
    Vincent, Maurice
    Wang, Shuu-Jiun
    Olesen, J.
    Evers, S.
    Charles, A.
    Hershey, A.
    Lipton, R.
    First, M.
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2013, 33 (09) : 629 - 808
  • [2] Buse DC, 2009, MAYO CLIN PROC, V84, P422, DOI 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)60561-2
  • [3] Health-related quality of life in patients with cluster headache during active periods
    D'Amico, D
    Rigamonti, A
    Solari, A
    Leone, M
    Usai, S
    Grazzi, L
    Bussone, G
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2002, 22 (10) : 818 - 821
  • [4] Health-related and condition-specific quality of life in episodic cluster headache
    Ertsey, C
    Manhalter, N
    Bozsik, G
    Afra, J
    Jelencsik, I
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2004, 24 (03) : 188 - 196
  • [5] FDA Labelling Packaging Insert, PRESCR INF EMG GALC
  • [6] The incidence and prevalence of cluster headache: a meta-analysis of population-based studies
    Fischera, M.
    Marziniak, M.
    Gralow, I.
    Evers, S.
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2008, 28 (06) : 614 - 618
  • [7] Treatment costs and indirect costs of cluster headache: A health economics analysis
    Gaul, Charly
    Finken, Julia
    Biermann, Janine
    Mostardt, Sarah
    Diener, Hans-Christoph
    Mueller, Oliver
    Wasem, Juergen
    Neumann, Anja
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2011, 31 (16) : 1664 - 1672
  • [8] Trial of Galcanezumab in Prevention of Episodic Cluster Headache
    Goadsby, Peter J.
    Dodick, David W.
    Leone, Massimo
    Bardos, Jennifer N.
    Oakes, Tina M.
    Millen, Brian A.
    Zhou, Chunmei
    Dowsett, Sherie A.
    Aurora, Sheena K.
    Ahn, Andrew H.
    Yang, Jyun-Yan
    Conley, Robert R.
    Martinez, James M.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 381 (02) : 132 - 141
  • [9] Guy W, ECDEU ASSESSMENT MAN, P217
  • [10] Impairment in episodic and chronic cluster headache
    Juergens, Tim P.
    Gaul, Charly
    Lindwurm, Andrea
    Dresler, Thomas
    Paelecke-Habermann, Yvonne
    Schmidt-Wilcke, Tobias
    Luerding, Ralf
    Henkel, Karsten
    Leinisch, Elke
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2011, 31 (06) : 671 - 682