Association between comorbidity and participation in breast and cervical cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:46
作者
Diaz, Abbey [1 ]
Kang, Jimin [2 ,3 ]
Moore, Suzanne P. [1 ]
Baade, Peter [4 ]
Langbecker, Danette [5 ]
Condon, John R. [1 ]
Valery, Patricia C. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Charles Darwin Univ, Menzies Sch Hlth Res, Wellbeing & Preventable Chron Dis, POB 10639, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, 288 Herston Rd, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia
[3] QIMR Berghofer Med Res Inst, 300 Herston Rd, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia
[4] Canc Council Queensland, 553 Gregory Terrace, Fortitude Valley, Qld 4006, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, Ctr Online Hlth, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Comorbidity; Multimorbidity; Chronic disease; Breast neoplasms; Cervical neoplasms; Cancer screening; Early detection of cancer; Mammography; Papanicolaou test; Meta-analysis; COLORECTAL-CANCER; CHRONIC DISEASES; EARLY-DIAGNOSIS; HEALTH-STATUS; OLDER WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; ADHERENCE; PHYSICIAN; MORTALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.canep.2016.12.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Comorbidity is associated with poor outcomes for cancer patients but it is less clear how it influences cancer prevention and early detection. This review synthesizes evidence from studies that have quantified the association between comorbidity and participation in breast and cervical screening. Methods: PubMed, CINAHL and EMBASE databases were systematically searched using key terms related to cancer screening and comorbidity for original research articles published between 1 January 1991 and 21 March 2016. Two reviewers independently screened 1283 studies that met eligibility criteria related to Population (adult, non-cancer populations), Exposure (comorbidity), Comparison (a 'no comorbidity' group), and Outcome (participation in breast cancer or cervical screening). Data was extracted and risk of bias assessed using a standardised tool from the 22 studies identified for inclusion (17 breast; 13 cervical). Meta-analyses were performed for participation in breast and cervical screening, stratified by important study characteristics. Results: The majority of studies were conducted in the United States. Results of individual studies were variable. Most had medium to high risk of bias. Based on the three "low risk of bias" studies, mammography screening was less common among those with comorbidity (pooled Odds Ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.88). The one "low risk of bias" study of cervical screening reported a negative association between comorbidity and participation. Conclusion: While a definitive conclusion could not be drawn, the results from high quality studies suggest that women with comorbidity are less likely to participate in breast, and possibly cervical, cancer screening. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 19
页数:13
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [61] Validity of Charlson Comorbidity Index in patients hospitalised with acute coronary syndrome. Insights from the nationwide AMIS Plus registry 2002-2012
    Radovanovic, Dragana
    Seifert, Burkhardt
    Urban, Philip
    Eberli, Franz R.
    Rickli, Hans
    Bertel, Osmund
    Puhan, Milo A.
    Erne, Paul
    [J]. HEART, 2014, 100 (04) : 288 - 294
  • [62] Lifestyle and health-related predictors of cervical cancer screening attendance in a Swiss population-based study
    Richard, Aline
    Rohrmann, Sabine
    Schmid, Seraina M.
    Tirri, Brigitte Frey
    Huang, Dorothy J.
    Gueth, Uwe
    Eichholzer, Monika
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 39 (06) : 870 - 876
  • [63] Review of methods used to measure comorbidity in cancer populations: No gold standard exists
    Sarfati, Diana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (09) : 924 - 933
  • [64] ACCELERATED DECLINE IN CERVICAL-CANCER MORTALITY IN ENGLAND AND WALES
    SASIENI, P
    CUZICK, J
    FARMERY, E
    [J]. LANCET, 1995, 346 (8989): : 1566 - 1567
  • [65] Breast cancer screening in women aged 80 and older: Results from a national survey
    Schonberg, MA
    McCarthy, EP
    Davis, RB
    Phillips, RS
    Hamel, MB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (10) : 1688 - 1695
  • [66] Preventive health care among older women in an academic primary care practice
    Schonberg, Mara A.
    York, Meghan
    Basu, Nisha
    Olveczky, Daniele
    Marcantonio, Edward R.
    [J]. WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2008, 18 (04) : 249 - 256
  • [67] How effective are breast cancer screening programmes by mammography? Review of the current evidence
    Schopper, Doris
    de Wolf, Chris
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (11) : 1916 - 1923
  • [68] Prevalence and predictors of cancer screening among American Indian and Alaska native people: the EARTH study
    Schumacher, Mary Catherine
    Slattery, Martha L.
    Lanier, Anne P.
    Ma, Khe-Ni
    Edwards, Sandra
    Ferucci, Elizabeth D.
    Tom-Orme, Lillian
    [J]. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2008, 19 (07) : 725 - 737
  • [69] Shea B., 2013, The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses
  • [70] Simonds VW, 2011, ETHNIC DIS, V21, P202