Social network analysis of multi-stakeholder platforms in agricultural research for development: Opportunities and constraints for innovation and scaling

被引:106
|
作者
Hermans, Frans [1 ]
Sartas, Murat [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Van Schagen, Boudy [5 ]
van Asten, Piet [6 ]
Schut, Marc [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Agr Dev Transit Econ IAMO, Theodor Lieser Str 2, Halle, Saale, Germany
[2] Wageningen Univ, Knowledge Technol & Innovat Grp, Ew Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Int Inst Trop Agr, Kacyiru, Kigali, Rwanda
[4] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Urban & Rural Dev, Ulls Vag Uppsala, Sweden
[5] Biovers Int Quartier Kabondo, Rohero 1,Ave 18 Septembre 10, Bujumbura, Burundi
[6] Int Inst Trop Agr, Kampala, Uganda
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
STATISTICAL-MODELS; SYSTEMS; PARTICIPATION; GOVERNANCE; TRANSITION; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; POLICY; UNFOLD;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0169634
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Multi-stakeholder platforms (MSPs) are seen as a promising vehicle to achieve agricultural development impacts. By increasing collaboration, exchange of knowledge and influence mediation among farmers, researchers and other stakeholders, MSPs supposedly enhance their 'capacity to innovate' and contribute to the 'scaling of innovations'. The objective of this paper is to explore the capacity to innovate and scaling potential of three MSPs in Burundi, Rwanda and the South Kivu province located in the eastern part of Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). In order to do this, we apply Social Network Analysis and Exponential Random Graph Modelling (ERGM) to investigate the structural properties of the collaborative, knowledge exchange and influence networks of these MSPs and compared them against value propositions derived from the innovation network literature. Results demonstrate a number of mismatches between collaboration, knowledge exchange and influence networks for effective innovation and scaling processes in all three countries: NGOs and private sector are respectively over- and under-represented in the MSP networks. Linkages between local and higher levels are weak, and influential organisations (e.g., high-level government actors) are often not part of the MSP or are not actively linked to by other organisations. Organisations with a central position in the knowledge network are more sought out for collaboration. The scaling of innovations is primarily between the same type of organisations across different administrative levels, but not between different types of organisations. The results illustrate the potential of Social Network Analysis and ERGMs to identify the strengths and limitations of MSPs in terms of achieving development impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Effects of multi-stakeholder platforms on multi-stakeholder innovation networks: Implications for research for development interventions targeting innovations at scale
    Sartas, Murat
    Schut, Marc
    Hermans, Frans
    van Asten, Piet
    Leeuwis, Cees
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (06):
  • [2] The Agricultural Community as a Social Network in a Collaborative, Multi-Stakeholder Problem-Solving Process
    Simpson, Hugh C.
    de Loe, Rob C.
    WATER, 2017, 9 (10)
  • [3] Actor social networks as knowledge sharing mechanisms in multi-stakeholder processes: a case of coffee innovation platforms of Uganda
    Magala, Damalie Babirye
    Mangheni, Margaret Najjingo
    Miiro, Richard Fred
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION & EXTENSION, 2019, 25 (04) : 323 - 336
  • [4] Multi-Stakeholder Innovation in Smart City Discourse: Quadruple Helix Thinking in the Age of "Platforms"
    Borghys, Koen
    van der Graaf, Shenja
    Walravens, Nils
    Van Compernolle, Mathias
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE CITIES, 2020, 2
  • [5] Compositional dynamics of multilevel innovation platforms in agricultural research for development
    Lamers, Dieuwke
    Schut, Marc
    Klerkx, Laurens
    van Asten, Piet
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2017, 44 (06) : 739 - 752
  • [6] Navigating psychological barriers in agricultural innovation adoption: A multi-stakeholder perspective
    Chindasombatcharoen, Nopparuj
    Tsolakis, Naoum
    Kumar, Mukesh
    O'Sullivan, Eoin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 475
  • [7] The design and management of multi-stakeholder research networks to maximize knowledge mobilization and innovation opportunities in the forest sector
    Klenk, Nicole Lisa
    Wyatt, Stephen
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2015, 61 : 77 - 86
  • [8] Factors influencing participation dynamics in research for development interventions with multi-stakeholder platforms: A metric approach to studying stakeholder participation
    Sartas, Murat
    van Asten, Piet
    Schut, Marc
    McCampbell, Mariette
    Awori, Moureen
    Muchunguzi, Perez
    Tenywa, Moses
    Namazzi, Sylvia
    Amat, Ana Sole
    Thiele, Graham
    Proietti, Claudio
    Devaux, Andre
    Leeuwis, Cees
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (11):
  • [9] Fostering social capital in an international multi-stakeholder issue network
    Saffer, Adam J.
    PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2019, 45 (02) : 282 - 296
  • [10] Conceptualizing the Impact of Social Capital on Knowledge Creation: Mediating Roles of Socialization and Externalization in a Multi-Stakeholder Agricultural Innovation Platform Research-in-Progress
    Semeon, Getahun
    Garfield, Monica J.
    Meshesha, Million
    David, Dessa
    AMCIS 2013 PROCEEDINGS, 2013,