Social network analysis of multi-stakeholder platforms in agricultural research for development: Opportunities and constraints for innovation and scaling

被引:114
作者
Hermans, Frans [1 ]
Sartas, Murat [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Van Schagen, Boudy [5 ]
van Asten, Piet [6 ]
Schut, Marc [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Agr Dev Transit Econ IAMO, Theodor Lieser Str 2, Halle, Saale, Germany
[2] Wageningen Univ, Knowledge Technol & Innovat Grp, Ew Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Int Inst Trop Agr, Kacyiru, Kigali, Rwanda
[4] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Urban & Rural Dev, Ulls Vag Uppsala, Sweden
[5] Biovers Int Quartier Kabondo, Rohero 1,Ave 18 Septembre 10, Bujumbura, Burundi
[6] Int Inst Trop Agr, Kampala, Uganda
关键词
STATISTICAL-MODELS; SYSTEMS; PARTICIPATION; GOVERNANCE; TRANSITION; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; POLICY; UNFOLD;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0169634
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Multi-stakeholder platforms (MSPs) are seen as a promising vehicle to achieve agricultural development impacts. By increasing collaboration, exchange of knowledge and influence mediation among farmers, researchers and other stakeholders, MSPs supposedly enhance their 'capacity to innovate' and contribute to the 'scaling of innovations'. The objective of this paper is to explore the capacity to innovate and scaling potential of three MSPs in Burundi, Rwanda and the South Kivu province located in the eastern part of Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). In order to do this, we apply Social Network Analysis and Exponential Random Graph Modelling (ERGM) to investigate the structural properties of the collaborative, knowledge exchange and influence networks of these MSPs and compared them against value propositions derived from the innovation network literature. Results demonstrate a number of mismatches between collaboration, knowledge exchange and influence networks for effective innovation and scaling processes in all three countries: NGOs and private sector are respectively over- and under-represented in the MSP networks. Linkages between local and higher levels are weak, and influential organisations (e.g., high-level government actors) are often not part of the MSP or are not actively linked to by other organisations. Organisations with a central position in the knowledge network are more sought out for collaboration. The scaling of innovations is primarily between the same type of organisations across different administrative levels, but not between different types of organisations. The results illustrate the potential of Social Network Analysis and ERGMs to identify the strengths and limitations of MSPs in terms of achieving development impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, The Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, V3rd
[2]  
[Anonymous], CIAT PUBLICATION
[3]   Power in Transition An Interdisciplinary Framework to Study Power in Relation to Structural Change [J].
Avelino, Flor ;
Rotmans, Jan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL THEORY, 2009, 12 (04) :543-569
[4]   Networks as Policy Instruments for Innovation [J].
Beers, Pieter J. ;
Geerling-Eiff, Florentien .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION & EXTENSION, 2014, 20 (04) :363-379
[5]   Social learning inside and outside transition projects: Playing free jazz for a heavy metal audience [J].
Beers, Pieter. J. ;
Hermans, Frans ;
Veldkamp, Tom ;
Hinssen, Jules .
NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2014, 69 :5-13
[6]  
Boloquy M, 2014, CITIZENS PERCEPTIONS
[7]  
Cash DW, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
[8]  
de Nooy W., 2005, EXPLORATORY SOCIAL N
[9]  
Dean, 2013, EXPONENTIAL RANDOM G
[10]   Academic Cross-Pollination: The Role of Disciplinary Affiliation in Research Collaboration [J].
Dhand, Amar ;
Luke, Douglas A. ;
Carothers, Bobbi J. ;
Evanoff, Bradley A. .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (01)