Multidisciplinary multifidelity optimisation of a flexible wing aerofoil with reference to a small UAV

被引:32
作者
Berci, M. [1 ]
Toropov, V. V. [2 ]
Hewson, R. W. [3 ]
Gaskell, P. H. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Mech Engn, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Queen Mary Univ London, Sch Engn & Mat Sci, London E1 4NS, England
[3] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Aeronaut, London SW7 2AZ, England
[4] Univ Durham, Sch Engn & Comp, Durham DH1 3LE, England
关键词
Multidisciplinary; Multifidelity; Optimisation; Flexible aerofoil; Small UAV;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-014-1066-2
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The preliminary Multidisciplinary Design and Optimisation of a flexible wing aerofoil apropos a small Unmanned Air Vehicle is performed using a multifidelity model-based strategy. Both the passively adaptive structure and the shape of the flexible wing aerofoil are optimised for best aerodynamic performance under aero-structural constraints, within a coupled aeroelastic formulation. A typical flight mission for surveillance purposes is considered and includes the potential occurrence of wind gusts. A metamodel for the high-fidelity objective function and each of the constraints is built, based on a tuned low-fidelity one, in order to improve the efficiency of the optimisation process. Both metamodels are based on solutions of the aeroelastic equations for a flexible aerofoil but employ different levels of complexity and computational cost for modelling aerodynamics and structural dynamics within a modal approach. The high-fidelity model employs nonlinear Computational Fluid Dynamics coupled with a full set of structural modes, whereas the low-fidelity one employs linear thin aerofoil theory coupled with a reduced set of structural modes. The low-fidelity responses are then corrected according to few high-fidelity responses, as prescribed by an appropriate Design of Experiment, by means of a suitable tuning technique. A standard Genetic Algorithm is hence utilised to find the global optimum, showing that a flexible aerofoil is characterised by higher aerodynamic efficiency than its rigid counterpart. Wing weight reduction is also accomplished when a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm is adopted.
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 699
页数:17
相关论文
共 57 条
[31]   Dynamics of transversely vibrating beams using four engineering theories [J].
Han, SM ;
Benaroya, H ;
Wei, T .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1999, 225 (05) :935-988
[32]  
Hodges D.H., 2002, Introduction to structural dynamics and aeroelasticity. England
[33]  
Holmes R.B., 1972, A Course on Optimization and Best Approximation
[34]   Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria [J].
Jin, R ;
Chen, W ;
Simpson, TW .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2001, 23 (01) :1-13
[35]  
Jones R. T., 1940, TR681 NACA
[36]  
Karamcheti K., 1967, Principles of Ideal-Fluid Aerodynamics
[37]  
Katz J., 2001, Low-Speed Aerodynamics, V13
[38]   Aeroelastic analysis of a flexible airfoil with a freeplay non-linearity [J].
Kim, SH ;
Lee, I .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1996, 193 (04) :823-846
[39]  
Kussner H.G., 1936, LUFTFAHRTFORSCH, V13
[40]  
Leishman J. G., 2006, Principles of helicopter aerodynamics, V2nd ed.