Does Modality of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Interval Surgical Debulking Matter in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer?

被引:6
作者
Al Mutairi, Nashmia Joudallah [1 ]
Le, Tien [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Newborn Care, Div Gynecol Oncol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Intraperitoneal chemotherapy; Interval debulking; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; INTRAPERITONEAL CISPLATIN; INTRAVENOUS CISPLATIN; STAGE-III; CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY; ONCOLOGY-GROUP; PACLITAXEL; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/IGC.0000000000000066
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives This article aimed to study the role of adjuvant intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and optimal interval surgical debulking. Method All patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed from 2007 to 2009. Demographics, related diseases, and survival outcome data were abstracted from the medical records. (2) statistics were applied to categorical variables. Cox regression was used to model progression-free survival (PFS), adjusting for age, residual status, and use of adjuvant IP chemotherapy. All P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results Sixty-five patients were reviewed. The median age was 63.3 years. The majority had stage III disease with serous histology. Optimal residual (<1 cm) after interval debulking was achieved in 34 (54%) of 63 patients. Sixteen patients chose to receive adjuvant IP chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 26.2 months. Fifty-one patients had progressed, with a median PFS of 17.5 months. Adjuvant IP chemotherapy was not predictive of PFS (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-3.44; P = 0.89). The estimated median overall survival was 37.8 months (95% CI, 29.9-45.7) in the intravenous group versus 48.1 months (95% CI, 37.9-58.3) in the IP-treated patients (P = 0.162). Conclusions Adjuvant IP chemotherapy was not predictive of survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in our small exploratory study. The role of IP chemotherapy in this setting needs to be further studied in a larger prospective patient cohort.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 467
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer [J].
Alberts, DS ;
Liu, PY ;
Hannigan, EV ;
OToole, R ;
Williams, SD ;
Young, JA ;
Franklin, EW ;
ClarkePearson, DL ;
Malviya, VK ;
DuBeshter, B ;
Adelson, MD ;
Hoskins, WJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (26) :1950-1955
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, CANC STAT
[3]  
[Anonymous], AM J OBSTET GYNECOLO
[4]   Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer [J].
Armstrong, DK ;
Bundy, B ;
Wenzel, L ;
Huang, HQ ;
Baergen, R ;
Lele, S ;
Copeland, LJ ;
Walker, JL ;
Burger, RA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (01) :34-43
[5]  
Boente MP, 1998, SEMIN ONCOL, V25, P326
[6]   Delaying the primary surgical effort for advanced ovarian cancer: A systematic review of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreduction [J].
Bristow, Robert E. ;
Eisenhauer, Eric L. ;
Santillan, Antonio ;
Chi, Dennis S. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 104 (02) :480-490
[7]   Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval surgical cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis [J].
Bristow, Robert E. ;
Chi, Dennis S. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 103 (03) :1070-1076
[8]   Cancer of the ovary [J].
Cannistra, SA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (24) :2519-2529
[9]   Identification of prognostic factors in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma [J].
Chi, DS ;
Liao, JB ;
Leon, LF ;
Venkatraman, ES ;
Hensley, ML ;
Bhaskaran, D ;
Hoskins, WJ .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 82 (03) :532-537
[10]   Critique of surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer [J].
Covens, AL .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2000, 78 (03) :269-274