Influence of Isothermal Treatment on MnS and Hot Ductility in Low Carbon, Low Mn Steels

被引:14
作者
Carpenter, Kristin R. [1 ]
Killmore, Chris R. [1 ]
Dippenaar, Rian [2 ]
机构
[1] Port Kembla Steel Works, BlueScope Steel, Port Kembla, NSW 2505, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Sch Mech Mat & Mechatron, Fac Engn, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
来源
METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS B-PROCESS METALLURGY AND MATERIALS PROCESSING SCIENCE | 2014年 / 45卷 / 02期
关键词
CAST LOW-CARBON; TRANSFORMATION TEMPERATURES; TRANSVERSE CRACKING; MICROALLOYED STEELS; THERMAL HISTORY; SULFUR; DEFORMATION; SLABS;
D O I
10.1007/s11663-013-9851-7
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Hot ductility tests were used to determine the hot-cracking susceptibility of two low-carbon, low Mn/S ratio steels and compared with a higher-carbon plain C-Mn steel and a low C, high Mn/S ratio steel. Specimens were solution treated at 1623 K (1350 degrees C) or in situ melted before cooling at 100 K/min to various testing temperatures and strained at 7.5 x 10(-4) s(-1), using a Gleeble 3500 Thermomechanical Simulator. The low C, low Mn/S steels showed embrittlement from 1073 K to 1323 K (800 degrees C to 1050 degrees C) because of precipitation of MnS at the austenite grain boundaries combined with large grain size. Isothermal holding for 10 minutes at 1273 K (1000 degrees C) coarsened the MnS leading to significant improvement in hot ductility. The higher-carbon plain C-Mn steel only displayed a narrow trough less than the Ae(3) temperature because of intergranular failure occurring along thin films of ferrite at prior austenite boundaries. The low C, high Mn/S steel had improved ductility for solution treatment conditions over that of in situ melt conditions because of the grain-refining influence of Ti. The higher Mn/S ratio steel yielded significantly better ductility than the low Mn/S ratio steels. The low hot ductility of the two low Mn/S grades was in disagreement with commercial findings where no cracking susceptibility has been reported. This discrepancy was due to the oversimplification of the thermal history of the hot ductility testing in comparison with commercial production leading to a marked difference in precipitation behavior, whereas laboratory conditions promoted fine sulfide precipitation along the austenite grain boundaries and hence, low ductility. (C) The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society and ASM International 2013
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 380
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Abushosha R, 1998, MATER SCI TECH SER, V14, P227, DOI 10.1179/026708398790301593
  • [2] Akhlaghi S, 1998, ISS MWSP CONF P, V36, P699
  • [3] ANDREWS KW, 1965, J IRON STEEL I, V203, P721
  • [4] Influence of thermal history on hot ductility of steel and its relationship to the problem of cracking in continuous casting
    Banks, K. M.
    Tuling, A.
    Mintz, B.
    [J]. MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 28 (05) : 536 - 542
  • [5] Carpenter K., 1994, THESIS U WOLLONGONG
  • [6] CHIMANI C, 2006, AISTECH 2006 P MAY 1, V1, P825
  • [7] Relative importance of transformation temperatures and sulphur content on hot ductility of steels
    Cowley, A
    Mintz, B
    [J]. MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 20 (11) : 1431 - 1439
  • [8] El-wazri A.M., 1998, IRON STEELMAK, V1, P37
  • [9] The effect of thermal history on the hot ductility of microalloyed steels
    El-Wazri, AM
    Hassani, F
    Yue, S
    Es-Sadiqi, E
    Collins, LE
    Iqbal, K
    [J]. ISIJ INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 39 (03) : 253 - 262
  • [10] EFFECT OF MN AND TI PRECIPITATES ON THE HOT DUCTILITY OF LOW-CARBON AND ULTRA-LOW CARBON-STEELS
    GAO, Y
    SORIMACHI, K
    [J]. ISIJ INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 35 (07) : 914 - 919