Using Design Thinking to Explore Rural Experiential Education Barriers and Opportunities

被引:8
|
作者
Wolcott, Michael D. [1 ,2 ]
McLaughlin, Jacqueline E. [2 ]
Hubbard, Devin K. [3 ,4 ]
Williams, Charlene R. [2 ]
Kiser, Stephanie N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Div Oral & Craniofacial Hlth Sci, Adams Sch Dent, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Practice Adv & Clin Educ, Eshelman Sch Pharm, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Joint Dept Biomed Engn, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] North Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC USA
来源
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT | 2021年 / 8卷
关键词
design thinking; rural education; experiential education; creativity; methodology; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; HEALTH-CARE; STUDENTS; COMMUNITIES; PLACEMENTS; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1177/2382120521992333
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Design thinking is a creative problem-solving framework that can be used to better understand challenges and generate solutions in health professions education, such as the barriers to rural education. Rural education experiences can benefit students, providers, and patients; however, placement in and maintenance of rural education experiences offer unique challenges. Design thinking offers strategies to explore and address these challenges. METHODS: This study used a design thinking framework to identify barriers of student placement in rural locations; this was accomplished using strategies to empathize with users (eg, students, practitioners, and administrators) and define the problem. Data were collected from focus groups, interviews, and a design thinking workshop. Design activities promoted participant discussion by drawing pictures, discussing findings, and creating empathy maps of student experiences. Qualitative data were analyzed to identify salient barriers to rural experience selection and opportunities for support. RESULT: Focus group (n = 6), interview (n = 13), and workshop participants (n = 18) identified substantial advantages (eg, exposure to a wider variety of patients, less bureaucracy and constraints, more time with faculty) and disadvantages (eg, isolation, lack of housing, and commuting distances) of rural experiences. Participants identified physical, emotional, and social isolation as a significant barrier to student interest in and engagement in rural experiences. Workshop participants were able to generate over 100 ideas to address the most prominent theme of isolation. DISCUSSION: Design thinking strategies can be used to explore health professions education challenges, such as placement in rural settings. Through engagement with students, practitioners, and administrators it was identified that physical, social, and emotional isolation presents a significant barrier to student placement in rural experiences. This perspective can inform support systems for students, preceptors, and communities that participate in rural educational experiences.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Design is cool, but ... A critical appraisal of design thinking in management education
    de Figueiredo, Marina Dantas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [32] DESIGN THINKING AS THE ENVIRONMENT FOR DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION IN EDUCATION
    Baran, Grzegorz
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI 2019), 2019, : 5671 - 5680
  • [33] Design and Design Thinking in STEM Education
    Yeping Li
    Alan H. Schoenfeld
    Andrea A. diSessa
    Arthur C. Graesser
    Lisa C. Benson
    Lyn D. English
    Richard A. Duschl
    Journal for STEM Education Research, 2019, 2 (2) : 93 - 104
  • [34] Identifying and modeling barriers to design thinking implementation in healthcare sector: an ISM-MICMAC approach
    Karloopia, Jyoti Jinagal
    Agrawal, Rajat
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 38 (08) : 1228 - 1254
  • [35] AN EXPERIENTIAL DESIGN THINKING COURSE FOR FRESHMEN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS
    Condoor, Sridhar S.
    Gorlewicz, Jenna L.
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, IMECE2022, VOL 7, 2022,
  • [36] Chasing innovation: a pilot case study of a rhizomatic design thinking education program
    Biffi, Alfredo
    Bissola, Rita
    Imperatori, Barbara
    EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2017, 59 (09): : 957 - 977
  • [37] DESIGN THINKING AND ART EDUCATION
    Taspinar, Seyda Eraslan
    ANADOLU UNIVERSITESI SANAT & TASARIM DERGISI-ANADOLU UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ART & DESIGN, 2022, 12 (02): : 379 - 397
  • [38] REFORM BY DESIGN: USING DESIGN THINKING TO CREATE TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN CHANGE IN SCHOOLS
    Nash, John
    EDULEARN11: 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, : 96 - 101
  • [39] DESIGN THINKING CHALLENGES IN EDUCATION
    Ericson, Asa
    Bergstrom, Mattias
    Larsson, Andreas C.
    Toerlind, Peter
    ICED 09 - THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN, VOL 10: DESIGN EDUCATION AND LIFELONG LEARNING, 2009, : 89 - +
  • [40] Using Design Thinking to break social barriers: An experience report with former inmates
    Canedo, Edna Dias
    Cancado, Emille Catarine Rodrigues
    Mota, Alana Paula Barbosa
    Bandeira, Ian Nery
    Costa, Pedro Henrique Teixeira
    Lima, Fernanda
    Amaral, Luis
    Bonifacio, Rodrigo
    JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS, 2024, 36 (07)