Using Design Thinking to Explore Rural Experiential Education Barriers and Opportunities

被引:8
|
作者
Wolcott, Michael D. [1 ,2 ]
McLaughlin, Jacqueline E. [2 ]
Hubbard, Devin K. [3 ,4 ]
Williams, Charlene R. [2 ]
Kiser, Stephanie N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Div Oral & Craniofacial Hlth Sci, Adams Sch Dent, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Practice Adv & Clin Educ, Eshelman Sch Pharm, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Joint Dept Biomed Engn, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] North Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC USA
来源
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT | 2021年 / 8卷
关键词
design thinking; rural education; experiential education; creativity; methodology; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; HEALTH-CARE; STUDENTS; COMMUNITIES; PLACEMENTS; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1177/2382120521992333
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Design thinking is a creative problem-solving framework that can be used to better understand challenges and generate solutions in health professions education, such as the barriers to rural education. Rural education experiences can benefit students, providers, and patients; however, placement in and maintenance of rural education experiences offer unique challenges. Design thinking offers strategies to explore and address these challenges. METHODS: This study used a design thinking framework to identify barriers of student placement in rural locations; this was accomplished using strategies to empathize with users (eg, students, practitioners, and administrators) and define the problem. Data were collected from focus groups, interviews, and a design thinking workshop. Design activities promoted participant discussion by drawing pictures, discussing findings, and creating empathy maps of student experiences. Qualitative data were analyzed to identify salient barriers to rural experience selection and opportunities for support. RESULT: Focus group (n = 6), interview (n = 13), and workshop participants (n = 18) identified substantial advantages (eg, exposure to a wider variety of patients, less bureaucracy and constraints, more time with faculty) and disadvantages (eg, isolation, lack of housing, and commuting distances) of rural experiences. Participants identified physical, emotional, and social isolation as a significant barrier to student interest in and engagement in rural experiences. Workshop participants were able to generate over 100 ideas to address the most prominent theme of isolation. DISCUSSION: Design thinking strategies can be used to explore health professions education challenges, such as placement in rural settings. Through engagement with students, practitioners, and administrators it was identified that physical, social, and emotional isolation presents a significant barrier to student placement in rural experiences. This perspective can inform support systems for students, preceptors, and communities that participate in rural educational experiences.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Learning From Failure Barriers to Using Experiential Education in Graduate Nonprofit Research Training
    Weaver, Rasheda L.
    Danley, Stephen
    Otero-Vera, Isel
    JOURNAL OF NONPROFIT EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP, 2018, 8 (03) : 305 - 321
  • [22] Framings in Indigenous futures thinking: barriers, opportunities, and innovations
    Cheok, Jessica
    van Velden, Julia
    Fulton, Elizabeth A.
    Gordon, Iain J.
    Lyons, Ilisapeci
    Peterson, Garry D.
    Wren, Liz
    Hill, Rosemary
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2025, : 613 - 633
  • [23] FOSTERING CREATIVE THINKING IN ENTREPRENEURSHIP AMONG RURAL STUDENTS THROUGH SOCIO-SCIENTIFIC ISSUES AND DESIGN THINKING INTEGRATION IN SCIENCE EDUCATION
    Siew, Nyet Moi
    Arifin, Sufirman
    JOURNAL OF BALTIC SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2025, 24 (01): : 169 - 186
  • [24] Using game design to increase teachers' familiarity with design thinking
    Bressler, Denise M.
    Annetta, Leonard A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2022, 32 (02) : 1023 - 1035
  • [25] Exploring the dynamics of design thinking in management education and training: a critical review, taxonomic analysis and practical implications
    Bathla, Arushi
    Chawla, Ginni
    Hofaidhllaoui, Mahrane
    Dabic, Marina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2024, 27 (09) : 337 - 359
  • [26] Design Thinking at a glance - An overview of models along with enablers and barriers of bringing it to the workplace and life
    Kernbach, Sebastian
    Nabergoj, Anja Svetina
    Liakhavets, Anastasia
    Petukh, Andrei
    2022 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INFORMATION VISUALISATION (IV), 2022, : 227 - 233
  • [27] Design Thinking for Competency-Based Entrepreneurship Education: The ToolBoard Methodology
    Teodoro, Jaume
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP (ECIE 2021), VOL 2, 2021, : 1027 - 1035
  • [28] Innovating Statistics Education: The Design of a Novel App Using Design Thinking
    Quinones, Daniela
    Ruz, Felipe
    Diaz-Arancibia, Jaime
    Paz, Freddy
    Osega, Jose
    Rojas, Luis Felipe
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (18):
  • [29] Education 5.0: Design Thinking Goes ICT
    Oberer, Birgit
    Erkollar, Alptekin
    CREATIVE APPROACHES TO TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED LEARNING FOR THE WORKPLACE AND HIGHER EDUCATION, THE LEARNING IDEAS CONFERENCE 2023, 2023, 767 : 417 - 426
  • [30] Disruptions as opportunities for new thinking: applying the studio model to business education
    Bandera, Cesar
    Somers, Mark
    Passerini, Katia
    Naatus, Mary Kate
    Pon, Kevin
    KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2020, 18 (01) : 81 - 92