Combining Checkpoint and Process Learning Analytics to Support Learning Design Decisions in Blended Learning Environments

被引:11
作者
Kaliisa, Rogers [1 ]
Kluge, Anders [1 ]
Morch, Anders, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Educ, POB 1072 Blindern, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
来源
JOURNAL OF LEARNING ANALYTICS | 2020年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
Learning analytics; learning design; blended learning; teachers; Canvas; social network analysis; text network analysis; TEACHER INQUIRY; SATISFACTION; PATTERNS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.18608/jla.2020.73.4
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Learning analytics (LA) constitutes a key opportunity to support learning design (LD) in blended learning environments. However, details as to how LA supports LD in practice and information on teacher experiences with LA are limited. This study explores the potential of LA to inform LD based on a one-semester undergraduate blended learning course at a Norwegian university. Our findings indicate that creating valuable connections between LA and LD requires a detailed analysis of student checkpoints (e.g., online logins) and process analytics (e.g., online content and interaction dynamics) to find meaningful learning behaviour patterns that can be forwarded to teachers in retrospect to support the redesign of courses. Moreover, the teachers in our study found the LA visualizations to be valuable for understanding student online learning processes, but they also requested the timely sharing of aggregated LA visualizations in a simple, easy-to-interpret format, yet detailed enough to be informative and actionable. We conclude the paper by arguing that the potential of LA to support LD is improved when multiple levels of LA are considered.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 47
页数:15
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Agostinho S, 2011, AUSTRALAS J EDUC TEC, V27, P961
[2]  
Alhadad SSJ, 2017, INTERACT DES ARCHIT, P54
[3]   Mutual development in mass collaboration: Identifying interaction patterns in customer-initiated software product development [J].
Andersen, Renate ;
Morch, Anders I. .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 65 :77-91
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, KNORP PRAX AG KLIN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, J Learn Analytics, DOI [10.18608/jla.2014.12.3, DOI 10.1145/2460296.2460312, DOI 10.18608/JLA.2014.12.3]
[6]   A Conceptual Framework linking Learning Design with Learning Analytics [J].
Bakharia, Aneesha ;
Corrin, Linda ;
de Barba, Paula ;
Kennedy, Gregor ;
Gasevic, Dragan ;
Mulder, Raoul ;
Williams, David ;
Dawson, Shane ;
Lockyer, Lori .
LAK '16 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS: THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL LEARNING ANALYTICS & KNOWLEDGE CONFERENCE,, 2016, :329-338
[7]  
Benesty J, 2009, SPRINGER TOP SIGN PR, V2, P37, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-00296-0_5
[8]   Technology tools to support learning design: Implications derived from an investigation of university teachers' design practices [J].
Bennett, Sue ;
Agostinho, Shirley ;
Lockyer, Lori .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2015, 81 :211-220
[9]  
Bonk C. J., 2012, HDB BLENDED LEARNING
[10]  
Conole G., 2013, Designing for learning in an open world