A comparative study of the stress-dependence of dynamic and static moduli for sandstones

被引:0
作者
Wang, Yang [1 ]
Han, De-Hua [1 ]
Li, Hui [2 ]
Zhao, Luanxiao [3 ]
Ren, Jiali [1 ]
Zhang, Yonghao [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Houston, Dept Earth & Atmospher Sci, Houston, TX USA
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, State Key Lab Marine Geol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] China Petr Logging Co Ltd, Xian, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
COMPRESSIBILITY; CRACKS; STRAIN; ATTENUATION; VELOCITIES; DILATANCY; BEHAVIOR; FRACTURE; MODEL; ROCK;
D O I
10.1190/GEO2019-0335.1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Understanding the differences between the static and dynamic elastic moduli of reservoir rocks is essential for the successful exploration and production of hydrocarbon reservoirs. However, the controlling factors on the dynamic-static discrepancy for sandstones remain ambiguous. Consequently, we have purposely selected three outcrop sandstone samples with large porosity contrast to investigate the effects of the stress state, magnitude, and load-unload history on the dynamic and static moduli through laboratory measurements. The results suggest that the dynamic moduli are systematically larger than the static moduli at almost any hydrostatic or deviatoric stress magnitude. In contrast, the static moduli are much more sensitive to the stress variations than the dynamic ones, leading to the decreasing dynamic-static difference upon hydrostatic loading and the increasing dynamic-static difference upon deviatoric loading. When the maximum stress in a cycle is initially reversed, the dynamic-static ratio tends to approach one, whatever the bulk modulus under hydrostatic pressure condition or the Young's modulus under triaxial stress condition. Under the subsequent unloading process, the static bulk modulus is always higher than that derived during loading. However, the unloading static Young's modulus is larger than the loading Young's modulus only at a relatively high deviatoric stress magnitude greater than 30 MPa, while showing an opposite trend at a low-stress condition of less than 25 MPa. From the microstructural viewpoint, it is believed that the static tests accumulate the elastic, viscoelastic, and nonelastic properties within a certain stress or strain range. In contrast to the dynamic modulus, the static modulus exhibits greater sensitivity to the pressure or stress changes under hydrostatic and deviatoric stress conditions. The strong stress dependence makes it important to consider the in situ stress conditions when establishing dynamic-static modulus relations.
引用
收藏
页码:MR179 / MR190
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Relations between hydraulic properties and ultrasonic velocities during brittle failure of a low-porosity sandstone in laboratory experiments [J].
Ahrens, B. ;
Duda, M. ;
Renner, J. .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 212 (01) :627-645
[2]   Static and dynamic behaviour of compacted sand and clay: Comparison between measurements in Triaxial and Oedometric test systems [J].
Bhuiyan, M. H. ;
Holt, R. M. ;
Larsen, I. ;
Stenebraten, J. F. .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2013, 61 (02) :329-340
[3]   The effect of fracture density and stress state on the static and dynamic bulk moduli of Westerly granite [J].
Blake, O. O. ;
Faulkner, D. R. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2016, 121 (04) :2382-2399
[4]   DILATANCY IN FRACTURE OF CRYSTALLINE ROCKS [J].
BRACE, WF ;
PAULDING, BW ;
SCHOLZ, C .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1966, 71 (16) :3939-&
[5]  
Catacosinos P.A., 1991, Early sedimentary evolution of the Michigan Basin
[6]   DYNAMIC AND STATIC MODULI [J].
CHENG, CH ;
JOHNSTON, DH .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1981, 8 (01) :39-42
[7]   Sliding crack model for nonlinearity and hysteresis in the uniaxial stress-strain curve of rock [J].
David, E. C. ;
Brantut, N. ;
Schubnel, A. ;
Zimmerman, R. W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2012, 52 :9-17
[8]   RELATION BETWEEN STATIC AND DYNAMIC YOUNGS MODULI OF ROCKS [J].
EISSA, EA ;
KAZI, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES & GEOMECHANICS ABSTRACTS, 1988, 25 (06) :479-482
[9]  
Fjaer E, 1999, ROCK MECHANICS FOR INDUSTRY, VOLS 1 AND 2, P675
[10]   Relations between static and dynamic moduli of sedimentary rocks [J].
Fjaer, Erling .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2019, 67 (01) :128-139