Mixing Bodily Fluids: Hobbes's Stoic God

被引:2
作者
Gorham, Geoffrey [1 ]
机构
[1] Macalester Coll, Deparment Philosophy, St Paul, MN 55105 USA
关键词
Hobbes; Stoicism; Corporeal God; Pantheism; Materialism; CORPOREAL; HOBBES; THOMAS; PHYSICS; BOYLE;
D O I
10.1007/s11841-013-0377-x
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The pantheon of seventeenth-century European philosophy includes some remarkably heterodox deities, perhaps most famously Spinoza's deus-sive-natura. As in ethics and natural philosophy, early modern philosophical theology drew inspiration from classical sources outside the mainstream of Christianized Aristotelianism, such as the highly immanentist, naturalistic theology of Greek and Roman Stoicism. While the Stoic background to Spinoza's pantheist God has been more thoroughly explored, I maintain that Hobbes's corporeal God is the true modern heir to the Stoic theology. The Stoic and Hobbesian gods are necessitarian, entirely corporeal, and thoroughly intermixed with ordinary bodies, while also supremely intelligent, providential, and good. And both gods serve as the ultimate source of diversity and change in a material world divested of Aristotelian forms and causes. Unfortunately, scholars on both sides of the long debate about the sincerity of Hobbes's theism have not taken very seriously his late articulation of a corporeal theology. One probable reason for this dismissive attitude is a lack of thorough investigation of the historical precedents for such an unusual godhead available to Hobbes. The first part of this article attempts to establish a close congruence between the Stoic and Hobbesian gods. The second part traces the likely sources for Hobbes's Stoic theology in his intellectual context.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 49
页数:17
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HOBBES ROUSSEAU COLL
[2]  
Baltzly Dirk., 2003, SOPHIA, V42, P3
[3]   IS 17TH-CENTURY PHYSICS INDEBTED TO THE STOICS [J].
BARKER, P ;
GOLDSTEIN, BR .
CENTAURUS, 1984, 27 (02) :148-164
[4]  
Berman David., 1988, HIST ATHEISM BRITAIN
[5]  
Brooke C, 2012, PHILOSOPHIC PRIDE: STOICISM AND POLITICAL THOUGHT FROM LIPSIUS TO ROUSSEAU, P1
[6]   How the stoics became atheists [J].
Brooke, Christopher .
HISTORICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 49 (02) :387-402
[7]  
Brooke JohnHedley., 2005, HETERODOXY EARLY MOD
[8]   HOBBES GROUNDS FOR BELIEF IN A DEITY [J].
BROWN, KC .
PHILOSOPHY, 1962, 37 (142) :336-344
[9]   The disciplined citizen: Thomas Hobbes, neostoicism and the critique of classical citizenship [J].
Burchell, D .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND HISTORY, 1999, 45 (04) :506-525
[10]  
Cavendish Margaret., 1664, Philosophical Letters