Evaluating the Household Level Outcomes of Community Based Natural Resource Management: the Tchuma Tchato Project and Kwandu Conservancy

被引:13
作者
Suich, Helen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2013年 / 18卷 / 04期
关键词
Africa; community based natural resource management; impact evaluation; Mozambique; Namibia; poverty; PROPENSITY-SCORE; INTEGRATED CONSERVATION; MEASURING POVERTY; PROGRAM; PARTICIPATION; PERCEPTIONS; WILDLIFE; AFRICA; MODELS;
D O I
10.5751/ES-05875-180425
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Community based natural resource management (CBNRM) programs aim to link the achievement of conservation objectives with those of rural development and poverty alleviation. However, after more than a decade of implementation in southern Africa, there is remarkably little rigorous analysis of their achievements with respect to these goals. An evaluation of two CBNRM interventions, the Tchuma Tchato Project in Mozambique and the Kwandu Conservancy in Namibia, measured the impacts at the household level using multidimensional poverty indices. The analysis found no positive impacts on the multiple dimensions of poverty arising from the Tchuma Tchato initiative in Mozambique. In Kwandu Conservancy in Namibia, positive impacts were felt only on household financial capital on a disappointingly narrow scale. These results have important implications for policy makers and program designers and demonstrate the necessity of developing targeted strategies if poverty alleviation outcomes are to be achieved. Further, if the assumption that the provision of incentives is key to encouraging and maintaining participation in CBNRM is correct, the delivery of appropriate benefits that have a sufficient impact at the household level will be crucial for the long run sustainability of these initiatives.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Abdi Herve, 2007, Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics, P103, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412952644
  • [2] Addison T., 2008, POVERTY DYNAMICS MEA
  • [4] Spatial clustering of rural poverty and food insecurity in Sri Lanka
    Amarasinghe, U
    Samad, M
    Anputhas, M
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2005, 30 (5-6) : 493 - 509
  • [5] Anand P., 2006, J SOCIO-ECON, V35, P177, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SOCEC.2005.11.013
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2009, Poverty dynamics: Interdisciplinary perspectives
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2002, ATLAS NAMIBIA PORTRA
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2002, EXPT QUASIEXPERIMENT
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2004, PARKS TRANSITION BIO
  • [10] Arndt C., 2006, Aid and Development: The Mozambican Case