Midazolam with meperidine or fentanyl for colonoscopy: results of a randomized trial

被引:46
作者
Hayee, Bu'Hussain [1 ]
Dunn, Jason [1 ]
Loganayagam, Aathavan [1 ]
Wong, Mandy [1 ]
Saxena, Vishal [1 ]
Rowbotham, David [1 ]
McNair, Alistair [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth NHS Trust, Dept Gastroenterol, London SE18 4QH, England
关键词
SEDATION-FREE COLONOSCOPY; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS; DIFFICULTY; PETHIDINE; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.033
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A combination of midazolant and opioid is usually used to achieve sedation and analgesia during colonoscopy Two commonly used opioids are meperidine and fentanyl, but few studies have compared their efficacy. Objective: This randomized trial aimed to compare the efficacy and recovery time of 2 sedation regimens consisting of midazolam in combination with either meperidine or fentanyl. Design, Setting, and Patients: A total of 300 Consecutive, unselected adults attending Outpatient colonoscopy at a District General Hospital were enrolled with informed consent and randomized to receive midazolam with meperidine or fentanyl. Data for procedure times, perceived discomfort (according to standard 100-mm visual analog scales [VAS]), and recovery time were collected. Patients and all endoscopy staff directly involved with the procedure were blinded to the regimen used. Main Outcome Measurements: Primary: patients' experience of pain (postrecovery VAS score); secondary: recovery time. Results: A total of 287 patients (150 female, mean [SD] age 54 [17] years) were studied. Recovery time (in minutes) was significantly shorter in patients receiving fentanyl (n = 138) than in those receiving meperidine (n = 149, mean +/- SE: 13.7 +/- 1.8 vs 18.7 +/- 1.7, P = .03), whereas there was no difference in the patients', endoscopists', or nurses' perception of pain during the procedure between the 2 groups. Both groups received a median dose of 3 mg of midazolam (range 2-5 mg). In patients receiving lower closes (2-2.5 and 3-3.5 mg), recovery times were significantly faster with fentanyl (P < .01 and < .05, respectively), whereas at higher closes of midazolam (>= 4 mg) there was no difference between the 2 groups. Limitations: The use of VAS scores and nurse assessment of recovery time were chosen in this study because, despite their subjectivity, these measures were felt to most closely reflect true clinical practice. Conclusions: The use of fentanyl in combination with low-close midazolam results in significantly faster recovery from sedation compared with meperidine, without any apparent loss of analgesic effect. (Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:681-7.)
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 687
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of the midazolam added with propofol-based sedation in esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A randomized trial
    Kim, Eun Hye
    Park, Jun Chul
    Shin, Sung Kwan
    Lee, Yong Chan
    Lee, Sang Kil
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 33 (04) : 894 - 899
  • [42] Propofol Alone Versus Propofol in Combination With Meperidine for Sedation During Colonoscopy
    Hsieh, Yu-Hsi
    Chou, An-Liang
    Lai, Yu-Yung
    Chen, Bing-Shuo
    Sia, Swee-Leong
    Chen, I-Cheng
    Chang, Yin-Lung
    Lin, Hwai-Jeng
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 43 (08) : 753 - 757
  • [43] Patient position and hypoxemia during propofol sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized trial
    Klare, Peter
    Huth, Raffaela
    Haller, Bernhard
    Huth, Martin
    Weber, Andreas
    Schlag, Christoph
    Reindl, Wolfgang
    Schmid, Roland M.
    von Delius, Stefan
    ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 47 (12) : 1159 - 1166
  • [44] Propofol compared with bolus and titrated midazolam for sedation in outpatient colonoscopy: a prospective randomized double-blind study
    Kim, Dae Bum
    Kim, Joon Sung
    Huh, Cheal Wung
    Ma, Dae Won
    Ji, Jeong-Seon
    Kim, Byung-Wook
    Choi, Hwang
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (01) : 201 - 208
  • [45] Non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation for colonoscopy is safe in low risk patients: results of a noninferiority randomized controlled trial
    Ferreira, Alexandre Oliveira
    Torres, Joana
    Barjas, Elidio
    Nunes, Joana
    Gloria, Luisa
    Ferreira, Rosa
    Rocha, Manuel
    Pereira, Sonia
    Dias, Sofia
    Santos, Antonio Alberto
    Cravo, Marlia
    ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 48 (08) : 747 - 753
  • [46] A Randomized Control Trial of Bupivacaine and Fentanyl versus Fentanyl-only for Epidural Analgesia during the Second Stage of Labor
    Craig, Margaret G.
    Grant, Erica N.
    Tao, Weike
    McIntire, Donald D.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2015, 122 (01) : 172 - 177
  • [47] Randomized Trial of Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Intravenous Morphine for Abscess Incision and Drainage
    Fenster, Daniel B.
    Dayan, Peter S.
    Babineau, John
    Aponte-Patel, Linda
    Tsze, Daniel S.
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2018, 34 (09) : 607 - 612
  • [48] Evaluation of Intranasal Fentanyl and Midazolam Among Inpatient Pediatric Patients
    Jampana, Sriya
    Harrison, Laura C.
    Mccall, Jessica
    Ferrante, Rebecca R.
    Winer, Jeffery C.
    Kink, Rudy John
    Rogers, Nathaniel G.
    HOSPITAL PEDIATRICS, 2024, 14 (10) : e439 - e442
  • [49] Comparison the sedation effect and satisfaction of two combinations, dexmedetomidine and fentanyl with midazolam and fentanyl, in patients undergoing bronchoscopy
    Karnali, Alireza
    Sarkhosh, Sepideh
    Kazemizadeh, Hosein
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 6 (06): : 296 - 299
  • [50] Comparison in Sedative Effects between Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam in Dental Implantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Wang, Li
    Zhou, Yi
    Zhang, Tiejun
    Huang, Lili
    Peng, Wei
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 2020