Midazolam with meperidine or fentanyl for colonoscopy: results of a randomized trial

被引:45
|
作者
Hayee, Bu'Hussain [1 ]
Dunn, Jason [1 ]
Loganayagam, Aathavan [1 ]
Wong, Mandy [1 ]
Saxena, Vishal [1 ]
Rowbotham, David [1 ]
McNair, Alistair [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth NHS Trust, Dept Gastroenterol, London SE18 4QH, England
关键词
SEDATION-FREE COLONOSCOPY; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS; DIFFICULTY; PETHIDINE; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.033
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A combination of midazolant and opioid is usually used to achieve sedation and analgesia during colonoscopy Two commonly used opioids are meperidine and fentanyl, but few studies have compared their efficacy. Objective: This randomized trial aimed to compare the efficacy and recovery time of 2 sedation regimens consisting of midazolam in combination with either meperidine or fentanyl. Design, Setting, and Patients: A total of 300 Consecutive, unselected adults attending Outpatient colonoscopy at a District General Hospital were enrolled with informed consent and randomized to receive midazolam with meperidine or fentanyl. Data for procedure times, perceived discomfort (according to standard 100-mm visual analog scales [VAS]), and recovery time were collected. Patients and all endoscopy staff directly involved with the procedure were blinded to the regimen used. Main Outcome Measurements: Primary: patients' experience of pain (postrecovery VAS score); secondary: recovery time. Results: A total of 287 patients (150 female, mean [SD] age 54 [17] years) were studied. Recovery time (in minutes) was significantly shorter in patients receiving fentanyl (n = 138) than in those receiving meperidine (n = 149, mean +/- SE: 13.7 +/- 1.8 vs 18.7 +/- 1.7, P = .03), whereas there was no difference in the patients', endoscopists', or nurses' perception of pain during the procedure between the 2 groups. Both groups received a median dose of 3 mg of midazolam (range 2-5 mg). In patients receiving lower closes (2-2.5 and 3-3.5 mg), recovery times were significantly faster with fentanyl (P < .01 and < .05, respectively), whereas at higher closes of midazolam (>= 4 mg) there was no difference between the 2 groups. Limitations: The use of VAS scores and nurse assessment of recovery time were chosen in this study because, despite their subjectivity, these measures were felt to most closely reflect true clinical practice. Conclusions: The use of fentanyl in combination with low-close midazolam results in significantly faster recovery from sedation compared with meperidine, without any apparent loss of analgesic effect. (Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:681-7.)
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 687
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Randomized controlled trial of probiotics after colonoscopy
    D'Souza, Basil
    Slack, Timothy
    Wong, Shing W.
    Lam, Francis
    Muhlmann, Mark
    Koestenbauer, Jakob
    Dark, Jonathan
    Newstead, Graham
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 87 (09) : E65 - E69
  • [22] Meperidine for dystocia during the first stage of labor: A randomized controlled trial
    Sosa, CG
    Balaguer, E
    Alonso, JG
    Panizza, R
    Laborde, A
    Berrondo, C
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (04) : 1212 - 1218
  • [23] Stability of midazolam and fentanyl in infusion solutions
    Wilson, KM
    Schneider, JJ
    Ravenscroft, PJ
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1998, 16 (01) : 52 - 58
  • [24] Obstetric analgesia: a comparison of patient-controlled meperidine, remifentanil, and fentanyl in labour
    Douma, M. R.
    Verwey, R. A.
    Kam-Endtz, C. E.
    van der Linden, P. D.
    Stienstra, R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 104 (02) : 209 - 215
  • [25] Midazolam and pethidine versus propofol and fentanyl patient controlled sedation/analgesia for upper gastrointestinal tract ultrasound endoscopy: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Agostoni, M.
    Fanti, L.
    Arcidiacono, P. G.
    Gemma, M.
    Strini, G.
    Torri, G.
    Testoni, P. A.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2007, 39 (11) : 1024 - 1029
  • [26] Gabapentin as Add-On to Fentanyl and Midazolam in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized, Blinded Study
    Salarian, Sara
    Memary, Elham
    Taheri, Farinaz
    Bagheri, Bahador
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2022, 50 (02) : 101 - 106
  • [27] Efficacy of different dose of dexmedetomidine combined with remifentanil in colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Jia, Li
    Xie, Meng
    Zhang, Jing
    Guo, Jingyu
    Tong, Tong
    Xing, Yuying
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [28] Propofol versus Midazolam in Medical Thoracoscopy: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial
    Grendelmeier, Peter
    Tamm, Michael
    Jahn, Kathleen
    Pflimlin, Eric
    Stolz, Daiana
    RESPIRATION, 2014, 88 (02) : 126 - 136
  • [29] A comparison of propofol and midazolam/meperidine sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Uzman, Sinan
    Gurbulak, Bunyamin
    Gurbulak, Esin Kabul
    Donmez, Turgut
    Hut, Adnan
    Yildirim, Dogan
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2016, 11 (03) : 178 - 185
  • [30] TOWARDS PAINLESS COLONOSCOPY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL ON CARBON DIOXIDE-INSUFFLATING COLONOSCOPY
    Wong, James C. H.
    Yau, Kevin K.
    Cheung, Hester Y. S.
    Wong, Denis C. T.
    Chung, Cliff C.
    Li, Michael K. W.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 78 (10) : 871 - 874