Morbidity of harvesting of bone grafts from the iliac crest for preprosthetic augmentation procedures: A prospective study

被引:208
|
作者
Nkenke, E
Weisbach, V
Winckler, E
Kessler, P
Schultze-Mosgau, S
Wiltfang, J
Neukam, FW
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Transfus Med & Hemostaseol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
bone graft; gait disturbance; iliac crest; morbidity; superficial skin sensitivity disorders;
D O I
10.1054/ijom.2003.0465
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
It has been the aim of the present prospective clinical study to assess the morbidity following the harvest of bone from the anterior and posterior ilium in elective preprosthetic augmentations. Fifty consecutive healthy patients (30 female, 20 male, mean age 52.5 +/- 9.3 years, range 31 years to 65 years) underwent augmentations of implant sites by iliac crest bone grafts. The bone harvest was carried out in 25 cases from the anterior and in 25 cases from the posterior ilium. The superficial sensory function of the skin was determined quantitatively preoperatively, 7 and 30 days after surgery with the 'Pain and Thermal Sensitivity' Test (PATH Test). On the same occasions subjective pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and gait disturbances were documented. In the PATH Test, for the innervation areas of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) and the superior,and middle cluneal nerves (SMCN) a significant impairment of the superficial sensory function could be found after I week and a significant tendency towards recovery after 1 month (warm stimulus(LFCN) (preop): 37.94 +/- 3.0degreesC, warm stimulus(LFCN) (day 7): 38.6 +/- 3.2degreesC, warm stimulus(LFCN) (day) (30): 37.9 +/- 2.9degreesC, P-LFCN (warm preop/day 7) =0.023 P-LFCN (warm) (preop/day 30) =0,886, warm stimulus(SMCN) (preop): 36.1 +/- 2.4degreesC, warm stimulus(SMCN day) (7): 36.6 +/- 2.3degreesC, warm stimulus(SMCN) (day 30): 36.3 +/- 4.0degreesC; P-SMCN (warm preop/day 7)<0.0005, P-SMCN (warm preop/day 30)=0.086). Gait disturbances were seen in seven patients after anterior and in three patients after posterior bone harvest 7 days after surgery(P-gait disturbance anterior/posterior =0.123). After 1 month none of the patients of both groups showed gait disturbances any longer. The maximum subjective pain level was found on the second postoperative day in both groups. It was significantly higher for the anterior approach (VAS(anterior) (day 2) 7.0 +/- 1.5, VAS(posterior day 2) 5.5 +/- 1.8 P-VAS anterior/posterior day 2 =0.004). At day 7 and at day 30, the pain levels did no longer differ significantly (VAS(anterior day 7) 3.7 +/- 1.4, VAS(posterior day 7) 3.2 +/- 1.6 P-VAS anterior/posterior day 7 = 0.165, VAS(anterior day) (30) 1.4 +/- 0.7, VAS(posterior day 30) 1.4 +/- 0.8, P-VAS anterior/posterior day 30 =0.724). Because of the lower morbidity of bone harvest from the posterior ilium in the early postoperative phase compared to the anterior approach it seems that it should be preferred in elective augmentation procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 163
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intracortical Versus Anteromedial Approach for Iliac Crest Bone Harvesting in Preprosthetic Surgery: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial
    Matteo, Marianetti Tito
    Simone, Staffoli
    Francesco, Di Nardo
    Alessandro, Moro
    Enrico, Foresta
    Giulio, Gasparini
    Sandro, Pelo
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 24 (02) : 369 - 372
  • [2] Prospective study of iliac crest bone graft harvest site pain and morbidity
    Kim, David H.
    Rhim, Richard
    Li, Ling
    Martha, Juli
    Swaim, Bryan H.
    Banco, Robert J.
    Jenis, Louis G.
    Tromanhauser, Scott G.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (11) : 886 - 892
  • [3] Bone harvesting from the iliac crest
    Jäger, M
    Westhoff, B
    Wild, A
    Krauspe, R
    ORTHOPADE, 2005, 34 (10): : 976 - +
  • [4] Donor site morbidity in the iliac crest bone graft
    Hill, NM
    Horne, JG
    Devane, PA
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 69 (10): : 726 - 728
  • [5] Harvesting iliac bone graft: Decreasing the morbidity
    de la Torre, JI
    Tenenhaus, M
    Gallagher, PM
    Sachs, SA
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 1999, 36 (05) : 388 - 390
  • [6] Endopelvic Approach for Iliac Crest Bone Harvesting
    Le Pape, Sebastien
    Gauthe, Remi
    Du Pouget, Laure
    Gille, Olivier
    Vital, Jean-Marc
    Ould-Slimane, Mourad
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 106 : 764 - 767
  • [7] A prospective study of factors influencing morbidity after iliac crest harvesting for oral onlay grafting
    Fretwurst, T.
    Wanner, L.
    Nahles, S.
    Raguse, J. D.
    Stricker, A.
    Metzger, M. C.
    Nelson, K.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (05) : 705 - 709
  • [8] A prospective study on the morbidity resulting from calvarial bone harvesting for intraoral reconstruction
    Putters, T. F.
    Schortinghuis, J.
    Vissink, A.
    Raghoebar, G. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 44 (04) : 513 - 517
  • [9] Morbidity of iliac crest donor site following open harvesting in cleft lip and plate patients
    Rawashdeh, M. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 37 (03) : 223 - 227
  • [10] Morbidity associated with anterior iliac crest bone graft harvesting in children undergoing orthopaedic surgery: a prospective review
    Clarke, A.
    Flowers, M. J.
    Davies, A. G.
    Fernandes, J.
    Jones, S.
    JOURNAL OF CHILDRENS ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 9 (05) : 411 - 416