Public awareness and perception of environmental, health and safety risks to electricity generation: an explorative interview study in Switzerland

被引:25
作者
Volken, Sandra [1 ]
Wong-Parodi, Gabrielle [2 ]
Trutnevyte, Evelina [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, USYS Transdisciplinar Lab, Dept Environm Syst Sci D USYS, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] CMU, Dept Engn & Publ Policy EPP, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
Technology acceptance; public preferences; energy technology risks; risk communication; LOCAL ACCEPTANCE; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; NUCLEAR-POWER; BIOGAS PLANTS; ENERGY; BENEFIT; PREFERENCES; UNCERTAINTY; PORTFOLIOS; ACCIDENTS;
D O I
10.1080/13669877.2017.1391320
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Well-informed public preferences are key to enabling successful and sustainable energy transitions worldwide. However, limited explorative evidence exists on what the public already knows and wants to know about the electricity generation technologies and their Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) risks. Understanding these issues is important for preparing informational materials and facilitating formation of informed preferences. We present results of an explorative interview study with 12 Swiss people. Despite the public debate on energy in Switzerland, we still identify significant awareness and knowledge gaps as well as misconceptions related to both technologies and their EHS risks. For accidental risks, the people tend to think beyond probabilities and consequences and consider further aspects, such as risk controllability and trust in experts and authorities. Most importantly, we find that people are able and tend to think of the electricity system as a whole portfolio: they actively realize the need to deploy multiple electricity technologies and accept some of the EHS risks. We conclude with concrete recommendations for preparing informational materials on electricity sector transitions in Switzerland and elsewhere. We also argue that future social research on energy should pay more attention to public perception of whole technology portfolios rather than single technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 447
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Energy Roadmap 2050 (No. COM(2011) 885 final)
[2]   The risk concept-historical and recent development trends [J].
Aven, Terje .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2012, 99 :33-44
[3]  
Bauer C, 2012, UMWELTAUSWIRKUNGEN S
[4]  
Bodemer N., 2015, SAGE HDB RISK COMMUN, P14
[5]   Developing communications about CCS: three lessons learned [J].
de Bruin, Waendi Bruine ;
Mayer, Lauren A. ;
Morgan, M. Granger .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2015, 18 (06) :699-705
[6]   Comparative risk assessment of severe accidents in the energy sector [J].
Burgherr, Peter ;
Hirschberg, Stefan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 74 :S45-S56
[7]  
Danish Ministry of Climate Energy and Building, 2012, DK EN AGR
[8]   Informed and uninformed public opinions on CO2 capture and storage technologies in the Netherlands [J].
de Best-Waldhober, Marjolein ;
Daamen, Dancker ;
Faaij, Andre .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2009, 3 (03) :322-332
[9]   Assessing what to address in science communication [J].
de Bruin, Waendi Bruine ;
Bostrom, Ann .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 :14062-14068
[10]   Public values for energy system change [J].
Demski, Christina ;
Butler, Catherine ;
Parkhill, Karen A. ;
Spence, Alexa ;
Pidgeon, Nick F. .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2015, 34 :59-69