Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine Surgery?

被引:9
|
作者
Brown, Luke [1 ]
Weir, Tristan [1 ]
Koenig, Scott [1 ]
Shasti, Mark [1 ]
Yousaf, Imran [1 ]
Yousaf, Omer [1 ]
Tannous, Oliver [1 ]
Koh, Eugene [1 ]
Banagan, Kelley [1 ]
Gelb, Daniel [1 ]
Ludwig, Steven [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
postoperative pain; opioid; liposomal bupivacaine; lumbar decompression and fusion; degenerative spondylosis; adverse events; safety; EXTENDED-RELEASE BUPIVACAINE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN-CONTROL; DEPOFOAM BUPIVACAINE; DOUBLE-BLIND; MANAGEMENT; ANALGESIA; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1177/2192568218755684
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Single-blinded prospective randomized control trial. Objectives: To compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and hospital length of stay between patients who received liposomal bupivacaine (LB) versus a single saline injection, following posterior lumbar decompression and fusion surgery for degenerative spondylosis. Methods: From 2015 to 2016, 59 patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression and fusion surgery were prospectively enrolled and randomized to receive either 60 mL injection of 266 mg LB or 60 mL of 0.9% sterile saline, intraoperatively. Outcome measures included the incidence of postoperative AEs and hospital length of stay. Results: The most common AEs in the treatment group were nausea (39.3%), emesis (18.1%), and hypotension (18.1%). Nausea (23%), constipation (19.2%), and urinary retention (15.3%) were most common in the control group. Patients who received LB had an increased risk of developing nausea (relative risk [RR] = 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-3.8), emesis (RR = 2.3; 95% CI = 0.51-10.7), and headaches (RR = 2.36; 95% CI = 0.26-21.4). Patients receiving LB had a decreased risk of developing constipation (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.25-2.43), urinary retention (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.21-2.85), and pruritus (RR = 0.78; 95% = 0.21-2.8) postoperatively. Relative risk values mentioned above failed to reach statistical significance. No significant difference in the hospital length of stay between both groups was found (3.9 vs 3.9 days; P = .92). Conclusion: Single-dose injections of LB to the surgical site prior to wound closure did not significantly increase or decrease the incidence or risk of developing AEs postoperatively. Furthermore, no significant difference was found in the hospital length of stay between both groups.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 137
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Use of Liposomal Bupivacaine for Pain Control After Shoulder Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Fares, Mohamad Y.
    Daher, Mohammad
    Boufadel, Peter
    Khan, Adam Z.
    Abboud, Joseph A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2025,
  • [32] Perioperative Pain Management for Elective Spine Surgery: Opioid Use and Multimodal Strategies
    Corley, Jacquelyn A.
    Charalambous, Lefko T.
    Mehta, Vikram A.
    Wang, Timothy Y.
    Abdelgadir, Jihad
    Than, Khoi D.
    Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M.
    Goodwin, C. Rory
    Shaffrey, Christopher, I
    Karikari, Isaac O.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 162 : 118 - +
  • [33] Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone Intercostal Nerve Blocks for Robotic Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Ganguly, Kingsuk
    Van Helmond, Noud
    Friedman, Adam
    Ahmad, Rabeel
    Bowen III, Frank
    Shersher, David D.
    Mitrev, Ludmil, V
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [34] Pain control using liposomal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine for robotic assisted thoracic surgery
    Molly Rincavage
    Lisa Hammond
    Shalini Reddy
    Christine Sytsma
    Amanda Prater
    Marcia Brackbill
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2019, 41 : 258 - 263
  • [35] The Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gong, Ruisong
    Tan, Gang
    Huang, Yuguang
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2024, 17 : 4039 - 4051
  • [36] Randomized clinical trial of liposomal bupivacaine transverse abdominis plane block versus intrathecal analgesia in colorectal surgery
    Colibaseanu, D. T.
    Osagiede, O.
    Merchea, A.
    Ball, C. T.
    Bojaxhi, E.
    Panchamia, J. K.
    Jacob, A. K.
    Kelley, S. R.
    Naessens, J. M.
    Larson, D. W.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 (06) : 692 - 699
  • [37] Efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine in port site injections on postoperative pain within enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery program: a randomized clinical trial
    Ma, Pearl
    Lloyd, Aaron
    McGrath, Morgan
    Shuchleib, Ariel
    Akusoba, Ikemefuna
    Jackson, Alice
    Swartz, Daniel
    Boone, Keith
    Higa, Kelvin
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2019, 15 (09) : 1554 - 1562
  • [38] Is liposomal bupivacaine superior to standard bupivacaine for pain control following minimally invasive thoracic surgery?
    Yang, Zhang
    Zhao, Liang
    Li, Shuangjiang
    Liu, Junhua
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 31 (02) : 199 - 203
  • [39] Effects of liposomal bupivacaine on opioid use and healthcare resource utilization after outpatient spine surgery: a real-world assessment
    Berven, Sigurd
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Lin, Jennifer H.
    Kakoty, Swapnabir
    Lavelle, William
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 24 (10) : 1890 - 1899
  • [40] The effectiveness of liposomal bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided abdominal wall blocks after open abdominal surgery: A systematic review
    Vereen, Maya S.
    Bidault, Vincent J.
    Krabbendam, Elise
    Hoeks, Sanne E.
    Stolker, Robert Jan
    Dirckx, Maaike
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2025, 25 (03)