Can Liposomal Bupivacaine Be Safely Utilized in Elective Spine Surgery?

被引:9
|
作者
Brown, Luke [1 ]
Weir, Tristan [1 ]
Koenig, Scott [1 ]
Shasti, Mark [1 ]
Yousaf, Imran [1 ]
Yousaf, Omer [1 ]
Tannous, Oliver [1 ]
Koh, Eugene [1 ]
Banagan, Kelley [1 ]
Gelb, Daniel [1 ]
Ludwig, Steven [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
postoperative pain; opioid; liposomal bupivacaine; lumbar decompression and fusion; degenerative spondylosis; adverse events; safety; EXTENDED-RELEASE BUPIVACAINE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN-CONTROL; DEPOFOAM BUPIVACAINE; DOUBLE-BLIND; MANAGEMENT; ANALGESIA; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1177/2192568218755684
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Single-blinded prospective randomized control trial. Objectives: To compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and hospital length of stay between patients who received liposomal bupivacaine (LB) versus a single saline injection, following posterior lumbar decompression and fusion surgery for degenerative spondylosis. Methods: From 2015 to 2016, 59 patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression and fusion surgery were prospectively enrolled and randomized to receive either 60 mL injection of 266 mg LB or 60 mL of 0.9% sterile saline, intraoperatively. Outcome measures included the incidence of postoperative AEs and hospital length of stay. Results: The most common AEs in the treatment group were nausea (39.3%), emesis (18.1%), and hypotension (18.1%). Nausea (23%), constipation (19.2%), and urinary retention (15.3%) were most common in the control group. Patients who received LB had an increased risk of developing nausea (relative risk [RR] = 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-3.8), emesis (RR = 2.3; 95% CI = 0.51-10.7), and headaches (RR = 2.36; 95% CI = 0.26-21.4). Patients receiving LB had a decreased risk of developing constipation (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.25-2.43), urinary retention (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.21-2.85), and pruritus (RR = 0.78; 95% = 0.21-2.8) postoperatively. Relative risk values mentioned above failed to reach statistical significance. No significant difference in the hospital length of stay between both groups was found (3.9 vs 3.9 days; P = .92). Conclusion: Single-dose injections of LB to the surgical site prior to wound closure did not significantly increase or decrease the incidence or risk of developing AEs postoperatively. Furthermore, no significant difference was found in the hospital length of stay between both groups.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 137
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Plain Bupivacaine for Pain Control Following Congenital Cardiac Surgery
    Tanner, Brandon M.
    Herrmann, Jeremy
    Lutfi, Riad
    Yabrodi, Mouhammad
    Abbasi, Rania K.
    WORLD JOURNAL FOR PEDIATRIC AND CONGENITAL HEART SURGERY, 2024,
  • [22] Paravertebral Nerve Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine for Pain Control Following Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy
    NeMoyer, Rachel E.
    Pantin, Enrique
    Aisner, Joseph
    Jongco, Robert
    Mellender, Scott
    Chiricolo, Antonio
    Moore, Dirk F.
    Langenfeld, John
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 246 : 19 - 25
  • [23] Sternotomy Wound Infiltration With Liposomal Versus Plain Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia After Elective Cardiac Surgery
    Subramaniam, Kathirvel
    Sciortino, Christopher M.
    Boisen, Michael L.
    La Colla, Luca
    Dickson, Alec
    Nowakowski, Emma
    Prangley, Kelly
    Ruppert, Kristine M.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2023, 37 (01) : 42 - 49
  • [24] Is the Role of Liposomal Bupivacaine the Future of Analgesia for Thoracic Surgery? An Update and
    Campos, Javier H.
    Seering, Melinda
    Peacher, Dionne
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2020, 34 (11) : 3093 - 3103
  • [25] Liposomal bupivacaine reduces postoperative pain and opioids consumption in spine surgery: a meta-analysis of 1,269 patients
    Daher, Mohammad
    Singh, Manjot
    Nassar, Joseph E.
    Casey, Jack C.
    Callanan, Tucker C.
    Diebo, Bassel G.
    Daniels, Alan H.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2025, 25 (03) : 411 - 418
  • [26] Real-World Data on Liposomal Bupivacaine and Inpatient Hospital Costs After Colorectal Surgery
    Anh Thu Tran
    Rizk, Elsie
    Haas, Eric M.
    Naufal, George
    Zhong, Lixian
    Swan, Joshua T.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 272 : 175 - 183
  • [27] Liposomal bupivacaine in transversus abdominis plane blocks for lower abdominal surgery
    Osuchukwu, Obiyo
    Gagnon, James
    Richard, Janelle
    Craig, Wendy
    Quaye, Aurora
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2024, 24 (05) : 717 - 723
  • [28] A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing an Opioid-Sparing Postsurgical Pain Management Protocol With and Without Liposomal Bupivacaine for Full-Arch Implant Surgery
    Lero, Phillip T.
    Mulherin, David R.
    Jensen, Ole
    Berry, Tom
    Danesi, Hassan
    Razook, Samuel J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2018, 33 (05) : 1155 - 1164
  • [29] Liposomal bupivacaine for open urological surgery: Friend or foe?
    Khurana, Jaasmit
    Fairey, Adrian S.
    Jacobsen, Niels-Erik
    Ip, Vivian H. Y.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (05) : 306 - 307
  • [30] Fifty Percent Reduction in Narcotic Use After Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Using Liposomal Bupivacaine
    Castillo-Sang, Mario
    Bartone, Cheryl
    Palmer, Cassady
    Truong, Vien T.
    Kelly, Brian
    Voeller, Rochus K.
    Griffin, Jeffrey
    Smith, Timothy
    Raidt, Hilary
    Answini, Geoffrey A.
    INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 14 (06) : 512 - 518